Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> This is not true, the content aggregation uses sax streams and there
> is no need for (re)parsing the parts.
> More technical: Two pipelines: p1:[g1 -> t1 -> t2 -> s1] and p2:[g2 -> t3
->
> t4 -> s2]
> and you want to aggregate them with [aggregate(p1, p2) -> t5 -> s3]
> This results in:
> [g1 -> t1 -> t2 \
> > t5 -> s3
> [g2 -> t3 -> t4 /
>
> So the serializers of the aggregated parts are ignored.
Uh, I guess I'm showing my ignorance on Cocoon2 here :)
Well, what can I say. It's the day of the apologies with you, Carsten.
If this is correct, then forget what I wrote above.
Stefano.
(ver happy to discover this)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
|