Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 68249 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2001 15:50:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 4645 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2001 12:24:18 -0000 From: "Vadim Gritsenko" To: Subject: RE: [C2]: Problems with current version Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 08:23:45 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Carsten, Replace http://www.slashdot.org/slashdot.xml with http://slashdot.org/slashdot.xml Regards, Vadim > -----Original Message----- > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@sundn.de] > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 3:34 AM > To: Cocoon-Dev@Xml. Apache. Org > Subject: [C2]: Problems with current version > > > Hi Team, > > I just tested the current cvs of 2.0: there are at least two > problems with the examples: > > 1. Aggregation: The url "http://www.slashdot.org/slashdot.xml" does not > provide > xml anymore. Has anyone a different working url providing xml or should > we > remove it? > > 2. The state examples: > There seems to be a bug in the currently used xalan version: > "When accessing child nodes in a NodeList passed to an extension > function an DTMDOMException is thrown." > This possible bug was detected by Christian and is reported to bugzilla > as bug 3722. > We can eiter exclude the two state examples or revert to an older version > of xalan (perhaps D4 or D5 should work). > As there were some major problems in those versions of Xalan, I think > reverting the xalan version is not an option, we should remove the > examples. > > Are there any other problems with the examples? > > And there is another problem: > When the distribution is build using JDK1.2 the tools.jar of the jdk1.2 is > copied > to the distribution as javac.jar. When the distribution is now rebuild with > jdk1.3 > or used with jdk 1.3, this jar cannot be read, making C2 unusable. You have > to > delete the javac.jar by hand. > I would propose that we do not distribute the tools.jar (or javac.jar) in > the > distribution. Or would this create other problems? > > Carsten > > Open Source Group sunShine - b:Integrated > ================================================================ > Carsten Ziegeler, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn > www.sundn.de mailto: cziegeler@sundn.de > ================================================================ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org