Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 72541 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2001 03:40:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 72530 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 03:40:20 -0000 Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 23:40:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Donald Ball X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? In-Reply-To: <3B730E7E.E1769624@anyware-tech.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > There are two distinct problems here that I'd like to discuss > separately: XSP as actions and the Action interface. +0 on xsps as actions. sure, it might be nice to leverage existing logicsheets in xsp actions, but writing a standalone action class is quite easy anyway. +1 on making actions not necessarily implement threadsafe. - donald --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org