Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 7085 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2001 21:34:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 7063 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 21:34:21 -0000 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:52:46 +0200 (CEST) From: giacomo X-X-Sender: To: Cocoon Developers Subject: Re: Source intergace: release() or recycle()? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Cocooners, > > Let's decide on this. Two opinions were expressed > (see Re: [PROPOSAL] Changing Source interface thread): > > > It seems that calling this method is necessary. I am +1 on release() > > as the source is not recycled. > > > >Carsten > > And: > > > The Recyclable interface is for any object--not just components! > > > > Berin > > I like Recyclable interface, so +1 to recycle() from me :) I'm somwhow off from the head so I'm +0 Giacomo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org