Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 36898 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2001 13:43:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 36887 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2001 13:43:22 -0000 Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 15:39:00 +0200 (CEST) From: giacomo X-X-Sender: To: "Cocoon-Dev@Xml. Apache. Org" Subject: Re: [C2]: Release plans In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hi Team, > > now that some weeks have passed since our last release (the beta 2), > we should plan our next steps for getting final with cocoon 2. > > Looking through the postings on the dev and user list over the last > weeks, I think we can be very proud of the current state of cocoon 2. > Of course there is enough space for improvements etc. > > Now that more and more people are getting used to cocoon 2, we get > more and more suggestions for making it better (and bigger). This > is really great and this is exactly what we need to keep on the > development of such a great open source project. > But I think, before we go on and change cocoon 2 here and there, > we should make a final release of 2.0 first. > We could then start with 2.1 and make the necessary changes (this > was one of the reasons why we currently maintain the two branches). > > Why a final release first? Many people (and companies) are waiting > for a long time to get c2. Most of them are scared of beta releases. > So if we make a final release we attract even more people and I > believe (or fear?) that the response might be overhelming us. They > can benefit from a final, offical release and we can benefit from > the reaction. +1. There is always room for improvements but sometime you need to get a release out before considering implementing new features (and there are alot outstanding already) > > So here is my suggestion: > - Making another beta which should include the points mentioned below What about a Release Candidate insead of a Beta? > - Looking for a time (about four weeks) if everything is stable, > fixing last bugs and making the final release (However, if the next > beta is unstable, we must make another beta after the period of time > and start with this point over and over again). +1 on four weeks > > What do we need for the next beta? > - Incorporate all outstanding patches and bugfixes (Dims has already > requested for this). > - Fix all outstanding bugs > - Decide which parts of C2.1 should go into 2.0 > - Update documentation. This point needs the most work, I think. The > documentation is currently a bit crowded. For example we have the > Sitemap documentation which explains all sitemap components, but > for matchers, selectors and actions there are different documents. > This should be unified and we should split the documentation into > user and developer documentation. The user docs mainly for installing, > configuring and using c2 by creating own pipelines and using the > existing components. > The developer doc should contain everything needed for building > own components. > - Final versions of the other projects used by c2, mainly these > are Avalon Excalibur, Avalon LogKit and Xalan. Perhaps we must also > update to a newer FOP version. Well, here we have many new features which propably will not make it into the 2.0 final version of Cocoon (ie. LogKit management, Resource Monitoring) > - Layout the distribution: What files in which format should really > get into the distribution. As everybody has the recompile the dist > to get the examples (in detail the sql examples) running, I think > we shouldn't include a half binary dist. We should only distribute > the sources, the required libraries, examples and (perhaps build) > documentation. And of course fix the scripts according to the platform they will be running on (eod-of-line problem) > I would propose to schedule the next (and hopefully final) beta for > the end of september, so we have the final release at the end of > October (the former ApacheCon Europe date....). +1. Though we might think of a release candidate instead of another beta. Giacomo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org