Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 14903 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2001 02:21:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 14892 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2001 02:21:23 -0000 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:20:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Donald Ball X-X-Sender: To: , Subject: RE: AW: JDK 1.3.1, Cocoon 2 and Linux - impressions? In-Reply-To: <003c01c11499$01294c00$4264a8c0@titus> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Kevin O'Neill wrote: > I've been running jdk 1.3.1, Redhat 7.1 (2.4 kernel), jboss/tomcat > (2.2.2/3.2.2), cocoon b2 running on a 500 MHz machine with 512 MB ram > and found the following. > > The stability issues for me seem to stem from the svg renderers thus > making the stability of the overall system quite bad (read jvm core > dumps). I haven't been able to reproduce the dump in a consistent > fashion (it seems to occur if you leave the service idle for a while, > come back, run an svg task that has previously executed, boom, core > dump. If ever I have a reproducible procedure I'll post it. i have found resin to be more stable that tomcat, especially when running batik. - donald --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org