Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 41150 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2001 07:22:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 41006 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2001 07:22:38 -0000 Message-ID: <3B4EA193.9DE8428A@anyware-tech.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 09:21:55 +0200 From: Sylvain Wallez Organization: Anyware Technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [fr] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: fr,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: [C2]: Jdk 1.2 or jdk1.3 ? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Donald Ball a �crit : > > On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > But our experience showed that if you compile c2 with the jdk 1.3 (which > > then is required) it does not always work with the jdk 1.2. I don't remember > > the details. > > really? that's shocking, the class file format didn't change, afaik. hmm. > > - donald > Sometimes the jdk 1.3 compiler produces class files whith a higher version number than the one accepted by jdk 1.2 See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=98984704015324&w=2 for an occurence of this. Anyway, it would be good for Cocoon core classes to be 1.2 savvy : there are some sites where 1.3 isn't available because customers are using an old (is 1 year considered old ?) app server that runs jdk 1.2.2 -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies - http://www.anyware-tech.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org