cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Man <Martin....@seznam.cz>
Subject Re: [RT] Alternative Solution to XSP
Date Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:16:01 GMT
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:25:26PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> 
> > How do we come back and reclaim our right to separate MVC+Mgmt?
> > One solution is that we implement SLL (does everyone remember
> > that?) and use SLL for tag libraries.  This will allow us to
> > remove code from our model.  What do we do when the logicsheet
> > is too low level like ESQL?  Don't get me wrong, Donald Ball
> > did a tremendous job with ESQL, but it is still mixing concerns.
> 
> well, thank you, but i don't quite see where you're getting at with mixing
> concerns. could you elaborate?

I would turn it the other way around (forgetting concerns mixage)
and say something as someone have said about Perl: "it's write-only language"
...yes I think logicsheets like these (except request-and session ones which
are fairly simple) are also "write-only"...

and I think even if we are unable to identify which concerns here are mixed we
see that this is not the correct way to go (again donald: you're THE GURU
developing something like ESQL :-)))


> 
> - donald

martin (3 days before final graduate exam :)
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Only dead fish swims with a stream"
gpg_key_available: http://globales.cz/~mman/martin.man.gpg
gpg_key_fingerprint: 2CC0 4AF6 92DA 5CBF 5F09  7BCB 6202 7024 6E06 0223

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message