cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ovidiu Predescu <>
Subject Re: [C2]: Beta 1 - It's there....
Date Wed, 06 Jun 2001 18:11:51 GMT
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:52:14 +0200, "Carsten Ziegeler" <> wrote:

> Hi Cocooners!
> Finally we did it! I just put the distribution of the beta 1
> into /www/

Congratulations! It's great to finally see it out the door!

> The distribution is signed with my public key which is included
> in the KEYS file of the distribution. I also published the key
> to ldap://
> Could someone verify that the distribution files are alright
> and properly signed?

I tried to verify the distribution files using gpg, but I get this
error message:

gpg: Signature made Wed 06 Jun 2001 09:11:09 AM PDT using DSA key ID F6E0A8F8
gpg: requesting key F6E0A8F8 from ...
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found

Did you use gpg to sign the package?

> So, congratulations to the C2 developer team and all "submitters,
> testers, patchers, critics etc"!
> Lets keep on this great work and spread the news!
> Now the CVS stuff:
> - I tagged the beta with cocoon_20_b1
> - I checked in the build.xml with the new version 2.1-dev
> - I made a branch of cocoon_20_b1 with the name cocoon_20
> - I checked in the build.xml with the new version 2.0b1-dev under
>   the branch cocoon_20_branch.
> So the HEAD is the 2.1 version and the 2.0 is a branch.

Yes, that good. I assume all the new development will happen only on
the HEAD and bug fixes will be applied to both HEAD and 2.0b1-dev
branch. Is this the common understanding?

> PS: And here follows the fun part for all of you interested in
>     building a distribution....
> Now, some problems I had with building the distribution:
> 1. I had no public pgp key suitable for signing the dist....
>    So I had to create a new one.
> 2. Operations on daedalus are slow
>    I used my own machine instead and had to transfer the 
>    files (Beforehand I had to install the jdk 1.2.2)
> 3. The build docs is not working on daedalus. The build
>    ends with an exception telling that a lib (I think it
>    was is missing.
>    Perhaps someone could check this?

Perhaps somebody needs to install LessTif on daedalus so the image
generation processing could work fine. I don't have access to the
machine so I can't help.

Ovidiu Predescu <> (inside HP's firewall only) (GNU, Emacs, other stuff)

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, email:

View raw message