Return-Path: 
 <cocoon-dev-return-13013-apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 16231 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2001 22:13:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 15215 invoked from network); 4 May 2001 22:13:31 -0000
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 23:37:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: giacomo <giacomo@apache.org>
X-X-Sender: <giacomo@lap1.otego.com>
To: <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: xml-cocoon/src/org/apache/cocoon/reading
 DatabaseReader.java
In-Reply-To: <20010504194313.67342.qmail@apache.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0105042334020.17389-100000@lap1.otego.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N



On 4 May 2001 bloritsch@apache.org wrote:

> bloritsch    01/05/04 12:43:12
>
>   Modified:    src/org/apache/cocoon/reading Tag: xml-cocoon2
>                         DatabaseReader.java
>   Log:
>   Made DatabaseReader cacheable.  It's wicked fast.  Great improvement.
>
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   No                   revision
>
>
>   No                   revision
>
>
>   1.1.2.16  +115 -47   xml-cocoon/src/org/apache/cocoon/reading/Attic/DatabaseReader.java
>

<snip/>

>   +    /**
>   +     * Generate the validity object.
>   +     *
>   +     * @return The generated validity object or <code>null</code> if the
>   +     *         component is currently not cacheable.
>   +     */
>   +    public CacheValidity generateValidity() {
>   +        if (this.lastModified > 0) {
>   +            return new TimeStampCacheValidity(this.lastModified);
>   +        } else {
>   +            return new NOPCacheValidity();
>   +        }
>   +    }

I'm not quite sure but doesn't this mean that if there is no
lastModified value it will never be invalidated because of the
NOPCacheValidity?

Giacomo


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org