Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 74873 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2001 06:59:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 74814 invoked from network); 4 May 2001 06:59:33 -0000 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 07:07:35 +0200 (CEST) From: giacomo X-X-Sender: To: cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: xml-cocoon/src/org/apache/cocoon/serialization AbstractSerializer.java LinkSerializer.java SVGSerializer.java Serializer.java In-Reply-To: <20010504003130.43369.qmail@apache.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 4 May 2001 dims@apache.org wrote: > dims 01/05/03 17:31:30 > > Modified: src/org/apache/cocoon/components/pipeline Tag: xml-cocoon2 > AbstractStreamPipeline.java > CachingStreamPipeline.java > src/org/apache/cocoon/serialization Tag: xml-cocoon2 > AbstractSerializer.java LinkSerializer.java > SVGSerializer.java Serializer.java > Log: > Undid my change to Serializer due to giacomo and carsten's -1. > > BTW, If anyone needs their Serializer to have access to objectModel, they > can subclass CachingStreamPipeline, overload process method to do exactly > what i just deleted from CVS. Yes, but the important word is "they". So *we* don't have to support that hack. We can propose the clean, simple and propper way how to do it. Don't get me wrong, Dims, it is not because we cannot do it, it is because we think it should not be done that way. But as always this is a community project and thus decisions are made because of -1 or +1 based on argumented discussion :) Giacomo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org