Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 29445 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2001 11:54:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 29351 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2001 11:54:51 -0000 From: "Torsten Curdt" To: Subject: RE: [C2] Proposal for "generator" URL protocol Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 12:54:23 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3AB12885.C6DE8F86@apache.org> X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Keeping in mind with the Separation of Concerns pattern, > I would like to simplify some Enterprise development functionality. > Our company has come up with some informational DTDs that > represent key consepts in our system. What would benefit us > is the ability to write a custom generator that supplies > those compositional units. Right now, we are forced to implement > that functionality as LogicSheets. It is much easier for > us to write and test a Generator than it is to do LogicSheets. > > The protocol would allow us to Xinclude or util:include those > units in approval and summary forms. > > The URL would be used like this: > > Do I get this right? You are talking about generator based including? ... So one XSPGenerator can include the result from another XSPGenerator? Sounds promising!! -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org