Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 78169 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2001 14:01:56 -0000 Received: from dnai-216-15-97-206.cust.dnai.com (HELO betaversion.org) (216.15.97.206) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 7 Mar 2001 14:01:56 -0000 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by betaversion.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id GAA08097 for cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 06:06:09 -0800 (PST) From: Giacomo Pati X-Authentication-Warning: kali.betaversion.org: nobody set sender to giacomo@betaversion.org using -f To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Performance of loggin Message-ID: <983973969.3aa64051a1256@mail.betaversion.org> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 06:06:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi all I've recently made a copy of C2 without any log.debug() statements in it for a test how much performance we loose using it that extensively. I've written a script that comments out every possible .debug() use in the sources (I confess I had to edit the sitemap.xsl manually but this wasn't much effort) I've used the ApacheBench tool for the mesurement. Well, probably someone else should made this test independantly (I may have done something wrong) because I haven't found *ANY* significant differences ??!! I've tested it several time with and without XSLT on the welcome page and everytime I get the same differences (less that 10ms per request). Does anybody may have a reason why? Giacomo