Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 60088 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2001 14:56:44 -0000 Received: from otego-gw-1.dataway.ch (HELO limbo.otego.com) (195.216.80.13) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 8 Feb 2001 14:56:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 24579 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2001 14:55:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lap1) (giacomo@192.168.222.104) by limbo.otego.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2001 14:55:53 -0000 From: Giacomo Pati Organization: Apache Software Foundation Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:55:54 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org References: <3A81AC3D.E2B77108@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3A81AC3D.E2B77108@apache.org> Subject: Re: Standardizing XSP Namespaces MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01020815555408.01059@lap1> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Berin Loritsch wrote: > sendmail | http://apache.org/cocoon/sendmail/v1 | sendmail | htt= p://apache.org/cocoon/sendmail/v1 > esql | http://apache.org/cocoon/SQL/v2 | esql | htt= p://apache.org/cocoon/SQL/v2 > > This is before I start porting the rest of the core > Logicsheets to Cocoon 2. > > Cocoon 2 URIs > ------------------- > pros: simple, short > cons: no versioning > > Cocoon 2 URIs > ------------------- > pros: versioning > cons: long > > My proposal is to make all the URIs like the last two entries > (sendmail and esql), because they are simple, and versioning > is included. +1=20 IIRC we (C2) decided many month ago to shorten the uri to apache.org=20 without the www because it doesn make any sense. Unfortunately we missed to define versioning. > Also--until dependence on the prefix are resolved we should > standardize on the Cocoon 1 prefixes. > > After dependancies on prefixes are resolved, the expected > results should be that if the stylesheet creates elements, > they should belong to the associated namespace, using the > default prefix. > > That means that > will _always_ return bar > even if the parameter was retrieved with > +1 as well. Seems to be a good standard Giacomo