I see your point about reinforcing the notion of using a namespace for each taglib. However, we have elements in our XSP page that are associated with a namespace that is not associated with any taglib. This forces us to declare that namespace in a child of <xsp:page>. It makes it awkward for those who use namespaces in their system for other purposes since it adds more meaning to the simple declaration of a namespace.
For example, in C1 we have to declare the wdk namespace in the wdk:page element, but it is customary to define them all at the document root which is xsp:page:
<xsp:page language="java" xmlns:xsp="http://www.apache.org/1999/XSP/Core" xmlns:wdktags="http://www.saba.com/XML/WDK/taglib">
From: Ricardo Rocha [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 6:49 AM
To: Cocoon Developers
Subject: Re: taglibs (was: XObject)
Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> The current XSP implementation allows for the inclusion of
>> "not-builtin" libraries by means of _top-level_ <xsp:logicsheet>
>> directives or root-level <?xml-logicsheet?> pi's.
> Some more questions:
> Which syntax should be preferred <xsp:logicsheet> or the PI?