Return-Path: <limmonen@urova.fi>
Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 93728 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2000 13:17:13 -0000
Received: from mail.urova.fi (193.167.212.200)
  by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2000 13:17:13 -0000
Received: from urova.fi (d213-223.urova.fi [193.167.213.223])
	by mail.urova.fi (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e9QDGfD21774
	for <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:16:41 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <39F828B8.35CA7487@urova.fi>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 15:51:04 +0300
From: Lassi Immonen <limmonen@urova.fi>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: fi,en,sv
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: [C2]Using logicsheets
References: <9B3E950CB293D411ADF4009027B0A4D21AC95F@maileu.imediation.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="------------5EC4AD4C59C53BA326CBFDB6"
X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------5EC4AD4C59C53BA326CBFDB6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> > Would it be possible to get logicsheet functionality to plain
> > .xml files
> > also by having logicsheet transformer?
> > This could also take away need to put xml-logicsheet prosessing
> > instruction in .xsp, wouldn't it?
> >
> > Like:
> > <map:match pattern="page">
> >   <map:generate src="page.xml"/>
> >   <map:transform type="logicsheet" src="page.xsl"/>
> 
> Hum... if I understood well your request, we end up with a XSP
> transformer. Someone has already expressed such a wish, but I'm not
> sure if it's a good idea, since IMHO it inhibits compilation which is
> not what we want. Does it make sense ?

Yes it does. I suppose I can always make transformers to get dynamic tag
behaviour in XML, if thats really necessary, thought would be easier to
do with logicsheet. Still trying to grasp C2 concepts and which it's
many ways of doing things is best for our project.

Any idea of performance difference between transformer just checking
some tags and putting dynamic stuff in place and XSP and logicsheet
doing the same? Should XSP be faster? 

Thanks,

  Lassi
--------------5EC4AD4C59C53BA326CBFDB6
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="limmonen.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Lassi Immonen
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="limmonen.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Immonen;Lassi
tel;cell:+358-40-7529690
tel;home:+358-40-7529690
tel;work:+358-40-7529690
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.urova.fi
org:University of Lapland;Digitys-project
adr:;;PL 122;Rovaniemi;;96100;Finland
version:2.1
email;internet:lassi.immonen@urova.fi
title:Designer
fn:Lassi Immonen
end:vcard

--------------5EC4AD4C59C53BA326CBFDB6--