cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <nicola...@supereva.it>
Subject Re: [C2] Short TODO list [was CLI almost there]
Date Mon, 02 Oct 2000 12:52:09 GMT
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <dims@yahoo.com>
> According to the docs, trax.Processor can pick up "plugged" Processors
using System Properties.
> (like org.xml.trax.Processor.xslt should point to the factory that can
instantiate an XSLT
> Processor). More info at
http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/apidocs/trax/Processor.html
>
> Is this good enough for moving forward?
>

Trax is the way to go, we already talked about it.
I suggest you look in the mail archive :)

nicola_ken

>
> --- Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicolaken@supereva.it> wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Davanum Srinivas" <dims@yahoo.com>
> > To: <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>; <Giacomo.Pati@pwr.ch>
> > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 1:40 PM
> > Subject: Re: [C2] Short TODO list [was CLI almost there]
> >
> >
> > > > > Is there anyone that wants to help replacing Xalan1 with Xalan2
using
> > > > > the TRaX interfaces?
> > > >
> > > > +100000
> > >
> > > Does this mean just replacing XSLTProcessor with trax.Processor?
anything
> > else?
> >
> > No, unfortunately things go much deeper, that is just the tip of the
> > iceberg.
> > The problem is that extensions are used and Xalan2 is not up to snuff,
> > AFAIK, but mostly the ting is that Xalan support was hardcoded.
> > I agree with Stefano, that XSL use in C2 code should be pluggable.
> >
> > nicola_ken
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
> http://photos.yahoo.com/
>



Mime
View raw message