Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 82266 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2000 01:48:39 -0000 Received: from balld-0.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO localhost.localdomain) (@216.254.77.75) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Sep 2000 01:48:39 -0000 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 501) id E11A7480F; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 21:51:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9056087; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 21:51:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 21:51:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Donald Ball X-Sender: balld@localhost.localdomain To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org, ricardo@apache.org Subject: Re: C2 XSP SQL taglib In-Reply-To: <39B040F5.B679836E@apache.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Ricardo Rocha wrote: > We may also consider XSLT's own use of where attribute > name can take a dynamic XPath expression: > > ... > > Since XSP doesn't support XSLT's {...} idiom inside attributes, we > may need to do something like: > > > > "new" + tagName > > fearfully, i point to a possibility inadequacy here. suppose, just suppose, the namespace weren't known at compile time either. should we make it complete by adding: unknownNamespaceString "new" + tagName i can assure you, i'll never actually _want_ to use this construct, but you _know_ someone will. right? or we could bite the bullet and add {} expression processing to the attributes of certain xsp elements. that would cut down on the number of elements we need to add to the language. - donald