cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Washeim <esa...@canuck.com>
Subject Re: [C2] Package names
Date Sun, 02 Jul 2000 17:42:52 GMT
on 2/7/00 7:39 pm, Mark Washeim at esalon@canuck.com wrote:

> on 2/7/00 3:23 pm, Stefano Mazzocchi at stefano@apache.org wrote:
> 
>> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>>> 
>>> In the sitemap proposal there are
>>> 
>>> org.apache.cocoon.matcher
>>> org.apache.cocoon.transformer
>>> org.apache.cocoon.chooser
>>> org.apache.cocoon.serializer
>>> 
>>> but
>>> org.apache.cocoon.generators
>>> 
>>> in pluralis...
>>> Inconsistent. Personally I would prefer the pluralis (with s) on all of
>>> them, but I think all agree that mixing should not be used.
>> 
>> Agreed.
>> 
>> Ok, guys, vote: singular or plural?
>> 
>> I don't care.
> 
> 
> Single. the package may contain matchers, plural, but the object is of type
> matcher. period.

Jeez, that was emphatic :) Sorry, I meant, I don't believe there is an
arguement from semantics that contradicts the observation that the object
type is singular, though the package may contain many of the type . . .

-- 
Mark (Poetaster) Washeim

'On the linen wrappings of certain mummified remains
found near the Etrurian coast are invaluable writings
that await translation.

Quem colorem habet sapientia?'

Evan S. Connell

 



Mime
View raw message