Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 60649 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2000 19:24:38 -0000 Received: from groovee.com (HELO groovee1.groovee.com) (207.17.112.235) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2000 19:24:38 -0000 Received: from aqua (dial-35-054.easystreet.com [206.103.35.54]) by groovee1.groovee.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA21104 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:24:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "David Duddleston" To: Subject: RE: WAR file Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:23:48 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3936B59E.3C634516@infoplanning.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N It is part of the 2.2 API. -david > -----Original Message----- > From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:bloritsch@infoplanning.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 12:13 PM > To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org > Subject: Re: WAR file >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >=20 > > Giacomo Pati wrote: > > > > > > > > Also: Might want to add ... I added it > > > > > > Why? > > > > > > > Also: Should the war file be cocoon.war or cocoon2.war > > > > > > Yes, I thought about it and decided to use the same name as the = jar > > > file. > > > > Since we are targetting Cocoon2 for Servlet 2.2, I think we should = just > > use WAR and forget about anything else. > > > > What do you think? >=20 > Isn't part of Servlet 2.2? Or is that Tomcat = specific? > If it's Tomcat specific, -1 on including it. If it is part of=20 > the standard, > +1 on including it. I like the ability for the servlet engine to=20 > load it up > when it starts so the first access doesn't take as long. >=20