Return-Path: <esalon@canuck.com>
Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 25801 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2000 16:12:20 -0000
Received: from the-gimp.canuck.com (HELO canuck.com) (204.50.15.12)
  by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2000 16:12:20 -0000
Received: from [195.252.153.217] (a1as10-p217.bln.tli.de [195.252.153.217])
	by canuck.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA48419528;
	Fri, 2 Jun 2000 10:11:16 -0600 (MDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.01 (1630)
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 18:12:15 +0200
Subject: Re: WAR file
From: Mark Washeim <esalon@canuck.com>
To: <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>, <rubys@us.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <B55DA97F.1000%esalon@canuck.com>
In-Reply-To: <852568F2.0056AEA6.00@d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

on 2/6/00 5:43 pm, rubys@us.ibm.com at rubys@us.ibm.com wrote:

> 
> 
>>>> Again, should we target for Java 1.2? The BSD folks will kill me :)
>>> 
>>> Is Tomcat targeted on Java 1.2?
>> 
>> I don't know... doesn't seem to me anyway... (but I'll better ask)
> 
> No it is not.
> 
>>> Thn we should target on java 1.2!!
>> 
>> I'm starting to think so too.
> 
> IMHO, the BSD issue is the biggest remainging hurdle.  I believe it is in
> Alpha.
> 
> - Sam Ruby
> 
> 

Sigh. I know that as developers you're eager to move forward on this but I'm
selfish :) 

I've got far too many NetBSD development servers in play right now. Sigh. .
. 

Just wanted to voice that, since we're also deploying cocoon in a production
environment (there it's also an issue, some deployment contexts are solaris
and some netbsd)....

-- 
Mark (Poetaster) Washeim

'On the linen wrappings of certain mummified remains
found near the Etrurian coast are invaluable writings
that await translation.

Quem colorem habet sapientia?'

Evan S. Connell