Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 69146 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2000 12:35:33 -0000 Received: from lisa.inter.net.il (192.116.202.14) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2000 12:35:33 -0000 Received: from ifrance.com (ras7-179.hfa.netvision.net.il [62.0.191.183]) by lisa.inter.net.il (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e5ACaZj03434 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:36:35 +0300 (IDT) Message-ID: <3942441D.F2BD0485@ifrance.com> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:35:25 +0200 From: Zvi Reply-To: thezvi@ifrance.com Organization: KGB.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Any alternative to XSL ? References: <20000609194605.2943.qmail@web219.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, XSLT processor is just one of possible processors (or filters in Cocoon 2 terminology). So you can write your own processor/filter and transform your XML in way you like it. Zvi meera b wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Separating creating, rendering, and serving of web > content into different layer is big step towards > cleaner design, but I wonder why Cacoon is so closely > related to XSL. > > User may want to use their favorite scripting language > to render XML files or use different technique > to process the XML. > > Can the idea of layering be made more flexible ? > > Any thoughts? > > Regards, > Meera > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints! > http://photos.yahoo.com