Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 87942 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2000 06:12:41 -0000 Received: from 175-49-22-12.user.darwin.net (HELO relativity.yi.org) (root@12.22.49.175) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2000 06:12:41 -0000 Received: from relativity.yi.org ([63.147.28.34]) by relativity.yi.org (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA17055 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 23:12:41 -0700 Sender: root@relativity.yi.org Message-ID: <39408B0D.583C1B2A@relativity.yi.org> Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 23:13:33 -0700 From: burtonator X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Infozone References: <00060520520907.01775@sheepy> <393CE886.B6A72AF1@apache.org> <393EDDF3.423557F3@relativity.yi.org> <393F8786.18E541BD@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > Demo User wrote: > > Demo User??? :_)... that was me posting from JavaOne... for some reason they had Netscape configured to ALWAYS post as "Demo User" and I didn't know it was forced on me :)... funny though :) > > The other issue is the license. We can't work with you in this > > configuration... as Stefano pointed out. Now there are three camps, > > Jetspeed/Cocoon/Turbine, Proprietery solutions, and now Infozone :( > > I know, duplication in OSS is bad, expecially if not driven by different > visions but only by licensing differences or "just happened that way". I brought this up at the Open Source EJB BOF at JavaOne last night... 3 Open Source EJB projects? Not a good idea :( > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > > > I'm thinking of using Prowler as CMS under Cocoon, of course. > > > > Honestly I would rather thing of it as Cocoon -> Jetspeed|Prowler. > > > > The interesting thing is that I am not sure how much Prowler applies... > > in an OSS world. Content syndication is very rare right now.... except > > XMLTree. Jetspeed has support for this in the Daemon package. There is > > a prototype plugin content subscription architecture in Jetspeed but I > > don't see the need. But then I am probably wrong as usual :) > > I honestly don't have a clue of what you're talking about... Check out isyndicate.com. They syndicate content from CNN, Reuters, etc. But they only do this for $$$. It would work for Open Source but only if there are more XML data syndicators that are "Open". Open Content will take a lot longer to happen than Open Source :( > > > It would be awesome to be able to distribute such a thing together with > > > Cocoon or Jetspeed, creating a sort of full-blown distribution.... but > > > the license restrictions will force us to follow other ways. > > > > Yeah... a full blown app server has been pending for a while :) > > AAAHHHHH: second golden rule: _never_ mention "app servers" if Stefano > is present. :) app servers, app servers :) -- Kevin A Burton (e-mail: burton@apache.org, UIN: 73488596, ZKey: burtonator) http://relativity.yi.org Message to SUN: "Please Open Source Java!" To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting. - Sun Tzu, 300 B.C.