Return-Path: <bruno.dumon@kh.khbo.be>
Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 33736 invoked from network); 18 May 2000 07:54:21 -0000
Received: from bashir.belgium.eu.net (193.74.208.147)
  by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 May 2000 07:54:21 -0000
Received: from (masq.khbo.be [193.121.139.1])
	by bashir.belgium.eu.net  with ESMTP id JAA16260
	for <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>;
	Thu, 18 May 2000 09:54:44 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from localhost by sevilla.khbo.be (8.9.3) id JAA31526;
 Thu, 18 May 2000 09:53:24 +0200
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 09:53:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Bruno Dumon <bruno.dumon@kh.khbo.be>
X-Sender: 4ieoi12@sevilla.khbo.be
To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: XLink Processor for Cocoon
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10005171427420.23216-100000@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000518095109.31308B-100000@sevilla.khbo.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N



On Wed, 17 May 2000, Donald Ball wrote:

> Hey, that's not bad at all! Would you care to comment on the pros and
cons
> of using XLinks v.s. XIncludes?
> 
> - donald
> 

XInclude is used for including things, XLinks is used for describing links
between documents. These are two completely different things. However,
with XLink it's possible to specify that something should be shown
"embedded", so that it appears to be included.


Bruno Dumon