Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 21040 invoked from network); 15 May 2000 17:38:48 -0000 Received: from firewall.altacast.com (HELO exchange.altacast.com) (63.84.216.2) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 May 2000 17:38:48 -0000 Received: by firewall.altacast.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 15 May 2000 11:38:43 -0600 Message-ID: <85CDFD92C550D311A1A40008C7DFA81A01D753@firewall.altacast.com> From: "Timm, Sean" To: "'cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org'" Subject: RE: [Cocoon 2.0] Beta Version on the 19th? Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 11:38:40 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thus, the problem with offline development. Hey Pier, I'd personally prefer you to continually check in the development code in CVS. I mean, hell, it's an alpha branch, it doesn't bother me if it doesn't work or even compile, but it does allow the rest of us to play in the repository too. Might even mean less work for you in the long run. Hell, I'd be +1 to have Paul check in his patches now unless it'd really mess you up. - donald +1...release early, release often... I have to admit it is kind of cool to suddenly have a whole slew of changes checked in with a whole bunch of new functionality, but it also prevents anyone who might have an interest in contributing from having any idea where the project stands. The last checkin Pier made was on April 6th... more than a month ago. There have been no status updates until now (at least to the general list...or I missed them, and I'm an idiot. :) ). Frequent check-ins also provide opportunity for more peer review. If someone sees something that sucks, they can say so instead of waiting for a month or two and having that much more code to wade through...or finding out that the something that sucks is an integral component of the entire design (not that I'm saying that Pier would do that...it's just the principle of the thing). - Sean T.