Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 23697 invoked from network); 30 May 2000 23:18:27 -0000 Received: from pop.systemy.it (194.20.140.28) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 May 2000 23:18:27 -0000 Received: from apache.org (pv15-pri.systemy.it [194.21.255.15]) by pop.systemy.it (8.8.8/8.8.3) with ESMTP id BAA16613 for ; Wed, 31 May 2000 01:18:25 +0200 Message-ID: <393433FF.EBC3F58@apache.org> Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 23:34:55 +0200 From: Stefano Mazzocchi Organization: Apache Software Foundation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; I) X-Accept-Language: en,it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Pipeline conditional model References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Donald Ball wrote: > > > To do this, one possible solution is to introduce boolean elements that > > operate on these matching components. For example, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...(pipeline)... > > > > > > which is the logical equivalent of (using Java syntax) > > > > ((A && B) || C) > > > > and reminds of inverse polish notation. > > (hopefully this hasn't been addressed already - i'm still paging through > my thousands of messages - y'all are some chatty people). I'm having > trouble reconciling the XML representation with the algebraic one. I would > write it like this: > > > > > > > > I don't like either models so I proposed Friedrich Nietzsche -------------------------------------------------------------------- Missed us in Orlando? Make it up with ApacheCON Europe in London! ------------------------- http://ApacheCon.Com ---------------------