Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 67200 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2000 22:01:29 -0000 Received: from pop.systemy.it (194.20.140.28) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Apr 2000 22:01:29 -0000 Received: from apache.org (pv3-pri.systemy.it [194.21.255.3]) by pop.systemy.it (8.8.8/8.8.3) with ESMTP id AAA19030 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 00:01:26 +0200 Message-ID: <38FF6BCC.DEB47FDD@apache.org> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 22:42:52 +0200 From: Stefano Mazzocchi Organization: Apache Software Foundation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; I) X-Accept-Language: en,it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: LGPL + APL = not good! References: <38FA4AD0.F5CECCEC@apache.org> <38FD444F.74C49D8C@relativity.yi.org> <38FD74D6.37234B8A@apache.org> <38FF4BA3.20C16F3D@relativity.yi.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N "Kevin A. Burton" wrote: > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > This is exactly the attitude that would ge us in trouble. In case you > > didn't notice, the ASF is responsible for the software that runs more > > than half of the internet and how much money is this worth? > > > > People get _killed_ for a lot less. A _lot_ less. > > Maybe in Italy ... ;) Not to start a "my country is better than yours fight" but aren't USA the country with the highest number of murders per inhabitant? :) Please, remove that old "italy == mafia" stereotype, yankee :) > Ug. I am sure you are right. We have to go by the lowest common > denominator since the software runs in different countries. Correct. > It is totally scary though. I mean all of us make $0.0 dollars off > this. It is totally confusing! Don't tell me. I'm almost a kid that codes software in his spare time... then three years later I'm part of the highest elite that just won the ACM price (the equivalent of the Nobel price for computer science) [hey, not for my merit, that's for sure :), I'm just on the bandwagon with those great guys]. Yes, we are not making money out of this, but this is pointless. Even that guy that wrote the DVD DeCSS program is young, finnish and not making any money out of it... that didn't help. Would you want to be the next? No thanks, I don't. Sure, they could sue the ASF and bankrupt us (weee, considering we have 35K$, that's probably not even enough to pay the latest of their layers for this)... so what? Or we win and we gain 100M$... then what? we distribute free -golden- t-shirts to all the apache committers? Apache wins if it stays out of the muddy battle fields of marketing and law as much as possible. Otherwise, we'll get in big troubles. Getting into those fields is _exactly_ what M$ and others would want us to do, so they can tear us (and our imagine) apart with media and lawyers. How do I know? I don't. But I don't want to know either. What we have is perfect... so why changing it? for a few lines of code? c'mon, let's be more creative than that. > > We do _not_ have the money to go to trial and unlike the FSF, we want to > > stay away of legal issues so we don't have legal consultants. > > Maybe something can be worked out... This is something that we _don't_ want to work out. Both IBM and Sun are willing to give us all the legal support we need, and I'm sure many layers will volunteer for that just for the prestige they would get. (open source is becoming another show-business, after all). But we don't want to have to. That's the point. -- Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. Friedrich Nietzsche -------------------------------------------------------------------- Missed us in Orlando? Make it up with ApacheCON Europe in London! ------------------------- http://ApacheCon.Com ---------------------