Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 25074 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2000 20:51:44 -0000 Received: from mailgate1.uea.ac.uk (139.222.230.1) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Apr 2000 20:51:44 -0000 Received: from mailserver1.uea.ac.uk [139.222.130.16] by mailgate1.uea.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.73 #1) id 12hIUg-0003rB-00; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 21:51:42 +0100 Received: from [139.222.176.10] (helo=nc1a.nca.uea.ac.uk ident=mail) by mailserver1.uea.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12hIUg-0004GF-00 for cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 21:51:42 +0100 Received: from paulr by nc1a.nca.uea.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 12hIUg-0005S5-00 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 21:51:42 +0100 Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 21:51:42 +0100 From: Paul Russell To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: LGPL + APL = not good! Message-ID: <20000417215142.E558@nc1a.nca.uea.ac.uk> References: <38FA4AD0.F5CECCEC@apache.org> <20000417142058.A558@nc1a.nca.uea.ac.uk> <38FB719C.9FF7D3A4@apache.org> <38FB7689.EAE6B4BC@earthlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.9i In-Reply-To: <38FB7689.EAE6B4BC@earthlink.net>; from brettmclaughlin@earthlink.net on Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 03:39:37PM -0500 Sender: Paul Russell X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 03:39:37PM -0500, Brett McLaughlin wrote: > My honest opinion is that as soon as LGPL enters Cocoon, we are going to > have problems that will only grow. Does this mean that we'll miss out > on some good code? Yes. Does it mean we'll have to work harder, > sometimes seeing fewer results? Yes. Is that worth being able to have > our user base use our software with impunity? Absolutely. Okay, agreed, see previous post re bean/class repository... If we're going to miss out on lots of code, lets at least make it easy for open licenced code to get distributed, eh? Paul