Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 90071 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2000 10:00:20 -0000 Received: from dnai-216-15-97-206.cust.dnai.com (HELO kali.betaversion.org) (216.15.97.206) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2000 10:00:20 -0000 Received: from apache.org(fumagallisrl.inet.it[194.185.223.22]) (1583 bytes) by kali.betaversion.org via smail with P:esmtp/R:internet/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 02:04:48 -0800 (PST) (Smail-3.2.0.106 1999-Mar-31 #3 built 1999-Sep-21) Message-ID: <38DB3BCE.A111DC72@apache.org> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:56:30 +0100 From: Pierpaolo Fumagalli X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: JDK 1.2 vs 1.1: the never-ending story. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jeremy Quinn wrote: > > I don't entirely agree, it has been a very stable and powerful (and > accessible) server platform for me for years. I've got servers that > have not been rebooted for over a year .... I know... But the multitasking environment is not the best you can get, performance-wise, under load there are other OSs who respond better and so on... Look, I am one of the greatest MAC fans on this planet, but I still prefer a good Unix kernel to serve my 10000000s hits/sec :) > But I am looking forward to MacOSX same as you! The MacOSX Server works _REALLY_ good... On a G4/500 (I believe) it was serving pages like a champ, and the GUI _IS_ nice ( not like that X stuff on other unices!) Pier -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- pier: stable structure erected over water to allow docking of seacraft ----------------------------------------------------------------------