Return-Path: <john.morrison@experian.com>
Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 57298 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2000 08:50:40 -0000
Received: from mailrelayg1.core.theplanet.net (195.92.195.230)
  by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2000 08:50:40 -0000
Received: from mailhost2.experian.co.uk ([195.92.54.51])
	by mailrelayg1.core.theplanet.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2)
	id 12JBmg-0000Rq-00
	for cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:50:39 +0000
Received: from experian.com (unverified) by mailhost2.experian.co.uk
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with SMTP id
 <B0001076386@mailhost2.experian.co.uk> for <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>;
 Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:53:29 +0000
Received: from UKNOTDT-Message_Server by experian.com
	with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:50:59 +0000
Message-Id: <s8a3cd73.057@experian.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:46:24 +0000
From: John Morrison <john.morrison@experian.com>
To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem with caching?

Hi all,

I've got a directory which contains an xml file with lots of data in it.  I've
got two style sheets that I want the data to go through, one to produce
an index and one to produce the contents (framed in HTML).  To do this I
have two little xml files which do something along the lines...

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="Contents.html.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<?cocoon-process type="xslt"?>

<!DOCTYPE contents [
<!ENTITY theContent SYSTEM "contents.xml">
]>
<contents>&theContent;</contents>

(the style sheet is different in the other-one).

The file which sets up the frames was pure html.  However I'm trying to
go through my site changing all html to xml so I can use voxml.  Replacing
the framing index.html with an xml+xsl combination causes the two
frames to load the same content.

I'm still trying to narrow why.  I think, maybe that it's the cache that's at
fault.  Question - has anybody else done this with more success than I'm
having?

Thanks all,

John.