Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 63838 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2000 02:36:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO envision.asiaconnect.com.my) (root@202.190.60.154) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2000 02:36:56 -0000 Received: from localbar.com (IDENT:niclas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by envision.asiaconnect.com.my (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA15912 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 10:42:52 +0800 Sender: niclas@envision.asiaconnect.com.my Message-ID: <38A225AB.A3763589@localbar.com> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 10:42:51 +0800 From: Niclas Hedhman Organization: Bali Automation Sdn Bhd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Class Naming, SAX 2.0, and Cocoon 2.0 References: <38A1C889.8B9DB143@earthlink.net> <38A1DAB7.E16FB065@apache.org> <38A1F471.18D40A99@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Pierpaolo Fumagalli wrote: > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > > Anyway, Pier, I don't like the XXXFactory classes too, let's come up > > with better names... > > - ParserFactory > - ProducerFactory > - FilterFactory > - SerializerFactory I somewhat disagree with this issue. I think the names above are splendid. Straight to the point. What is the issue? Names used in underlying packages has the same name as the Cocoon classes, or vice versa??