Pierpaolo Fumagalli wrote:
> 
> Hi all...
>         It has been a very long week-end, at least for me, but at the ends the
> results were (IMVHO) quite good.
> 
<snip />
> 
> Also, as soon as Xerces makes it available, I'm planning to integrate
> full SAX2 in it, but I can't do it without some way of testing.

Why don't you quickly write a wrapper that uses the SAX 2.0
ParserAdapater?  That makes a SAX 1.0 (or 2.0 alpha, for that matter)
parser give you all the callbacks (including namespace support) that SAX
2.0 does.  Wouldn't that be a work around?  I know Andy Clark is working
now on getting SAX 2.0 in, but until then.... I have been using the
ParserAdapater class and it works very well.

-Brett

> 
> Flames are accepted both on the M/L or privately :)
> 
> Take care...
> 
>         Pier
> 
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> -          P              I              E              R          -
> stable structure erected over water to allow the docking of seacraft
> <mailto:pier@betaversion.org>    <http://www.betaversion.org/~pier/>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - ApacheCON Y2K: Come to the official Apache developers conference -
> -------------------- <http://www.apachecon.com> --------------------