Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 23170 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2000 05:08:59 -0000 Received: from dnai-216-15-97-206.cust.dnai.com (HELO kali.betaversion.org) (216.15.97.206) by 63.211.145.10 with SMTP; 26 Jan 2000 05:08:59 -0000 Received: from apache.org(kali[216.15.97.206]) (1419 bytes) by kali.betaversion.org via smail with P:esmtp/R:internet/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 21:09:15 -0800 (PST) (Smail-3.2.0.106 1999-Mar-31 #3 built 1999-Sep-21) Message-ID: <388E82EE.C64023BD@apache.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 21:15:26 -0800 From: Pierpaolo Fumagalli Organization: Apache Software Foundation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [Moving on] SAX vs. DOM part II References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Donald Ball wrote: > > so far, it seems that pier's suggestion of SAX preferred for transport > between layers/filters, with the option of DOM access at the layer/filter > level is winning the voting. if so, what's the next series of steps to > take? where do I commit the Sax->Dom and Dom->Sax classes? Pier -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- - P I E R - stable structure erected over water to allow the docking of seacraft -------------------------------------------------------------------- - ApacheCON Y2K: Come to the official Apache developers conference - -------------------- --------------------