Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 98106 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2000 16:57:38 -0000 Received: from mail1.toronto.istar.net (209.89.75.17) by 63.211.145.10 with SMTP; 6 Jan 2000 16:57:38 -0000 Received: from [207.134.158.234] (helo=vincent) by mail1.toronto.istar.net with smtp (Exim 2.02 #1) id 126GCo-00019R-00 for cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 11:56:10 -0500 Message-ID: <00fa01bf5867$189ecf80$ea9e86cf@stria.ca> From: "Vincent-Olivier Arsenault" To: References: Subject: Re: more 1.2 depend's found Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 11:57:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 If my vote is worth anything, I vote fot 1.1.x compliance too! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Seth Ladd" To: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 11:49 AM Subject: more 1.2 depend's found > This is probably obvious, but the URLDecoder class, referenced in XSPUtil, > is only found in the 1.2 JDK. This might be done by design, but I would > vote that Cocoon stays 1.1.x compliant for the time being. I was looking > at the > mailing list archives for discussions on this, but it doesn't look like > it's been brought up. AFAIK, Solaris and Win32 are the only platforms > that have release versions of 1.2. I know Linux has a VM which is > "release candidate", but there are many other platforms out there that can > only support 1.1.x. > > Thanks, > Seth > >