Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-cvs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91860 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2003 02:15:46 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2003 02:15:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 97665 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2003 02:15:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-cvs-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 97500 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2003 02:15:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cvs-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list cvs@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 97489 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2003 02:15:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-2.1-cvs@apache.org Received: (qmail 97486 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2003 02:15:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2003 02:15:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 91822 invoked by uid 1389); 10 Oct 2003 02:15:44 -0000 Date: 10 Oct 2003 02:15:44 -0000 Message-ID: <20031010021544.91821.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> From: crossley@apache.org To: cocoon-2.1-cvs@apache.org Subject: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1 blocks.properties X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N crossley 2003/10/09 19:15:44 Modified: . blocks.properties Log: Clarify the explanation of "deprecated blocks". Other minor text tweaks. Revision Changes Path 1.34 +10 -10 cocoon-2.1/blocks.properties Index: blocks.properties =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/cocoon-2.1/blocks.properties,v retrieving revision 1.33 retrieving revision 1.34 diff -u -r1.33 -r1.34 --- blocks.properties 29 Sep 2003 10:18:32 -0000 1.33 +++ blocks.properties 10 Oct 2003 02:15:43 -0000 1.34 @@ -3,22 +3,22 @@ #------------------------------------------------------------------------------# # Remove blocks from your cocoon distribution by uncommenting the -# corresponding exclude property +# corresponding exclude property. -# NOTE: don't modify this file directly but make a copy named +# NOTE: Don't modify this file directly but make a copy named # 'local.blocks.properties' and modify that. The build system will override # these properties with the ones in the 'local.blocks.properties' file. # NOTE: "dependency" indicates blocks that are required by other blocks. -# disabling batik, for example, will prevent fop from compiling +# disabling batik, for example, will prevent fop from compiling. # Stable blocks ---------------------------------------------------------------- -# stable blocks are those that can be considered ready for production and +# Stable blocks are those that can be considered ready for production and # will contain components and API that will remain stable and where -# developers are committed to back compatibility. In short, stuff you can -# depend on. +# developers are committed to back compatibility. In short, stuff that you +# can depend on. #exclude.block.authentication-fw=true @@ -54,12 +54,12 @@ # Unstable blocks -------------------------------------------------------------- -# unstable blocks are currently under development and do not guarantee the +# unstable blocks are currently under development and do not guarantee that the # contracts they expose (API, xml schema, properties, behavior) will remain # constant in time. Developers are not committed to back-compatibility just yet. # This doesn't necessarily mean the blocks implementation is unstable or # the code can't be trusted for production, but use with care and watch -# its development as thing might change over time before they are marked +# its development as things might change over time before they are marked # stable. #exclude.block.apples=true @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ # Deprecated blocks ------------------------------------------------------------ -# Although these blocks are stable they have been deprecated in favour of other -# blocks. +# Although some of these blocks may have been stable, they are now deprecated +# in favour of other blocks. #exclude.block.xmlform=true