Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-cvs-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 12496 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2002 20:31:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-cvs-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-cvs@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 12487 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2002 20:31:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon2-cvs@apache.org Date: 19 Jun 2002 20:31:27 -0000 Message-ID: <20020619203127.41428.qmail@icarus.apache.org> From: shannon@apache.org To: xml-cocoon2-cvs@apache.org Subject: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/src/documentation/xdocs/faq faq-xslt.xml X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N shannon 2002/06/19 13:31:27 Modified: src/documentation/xdocs/faq faq-xslt.xml Log: extra copied content deleted Revision Changes Path 1.4 +0 -1 xml-cocoon2/src/documentation/xdocs/faq/faq-xslt.xml Index: faq-xslt.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-cocoon2/src/documentation/xdocs/faq/faq-xslt.xml,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- faq-xslt.xml 19 Jun 2002 20:16:52 -0000 1.3 +++ faq-xslt.xml 19 Jun 2002 20:31:27 -0000 1.4 @@ -88,7 +88,6 @@ Can I use different XSLT processors when processing different pipelines? -

For example, I found that PDF is faster with XSLT Xalan processor when I turn off incremental processing.

Yes. For Cocoon version 2.0.3, adapt the approach discussed in the following Cocoon snippet.

---------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: webmaster@xml.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-cvs-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: cocoon-cvs-help@xml.apache.org