Shared mountpoint is ok

чт, 18 июл. 2019 г., 12:14 Fariborz Navidan <mdvlinquest@gmail.com>:

> Hi
>
> I have already used this way. I feel local NFS mount point adds another
> layer over local storage and can affect IO speed and performance. What do
> you think of it? What about SharedMountPoint option? Between this and local
> NFS which one offers better performance?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 5:38 AM Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev_ia@bw-sw.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As for 4.11.2, no way to have multiple local storages configured for a
> > single host. There is no simple way to overcome it. The only one I see
> is a
> > pretty ugly - locally mounted NFS, created as a cluster wide storage when
> > only a single host added to a single cluster...
> >
> > In short, it's not supported, only one local storage per host. It's a
> great
> > feature request, but unsure many people use that topology.
> >
> > чт, 18 июл. 2019 г., 4:04 Fariborz Navidan <mdvlinquest@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have a few mount points which refer to different block devices on
> local
> > > machine. I am trying to add them as additional primary local storage
> to
> > > CS, Unfortunately, when adding primary storage there is no Filesystem
> > > option to choose. As a result I have managed to modify the storage_pool
> > > table settting the storage type to Filesystem. Then shows its state as
> > > "Up". However it because the path is under / such as /home and / is on
> > > different disk, it mistakenly detects the storage capcity as it is for
> > root
> > > filesystem and not the real size of filesystem /home belongs to.
> > >
> > > Any idea how to fix this?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> >
>