cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fariborz Navidan <mdvlinqu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Additional local storage as primary storage
Date Thu, 18 Jul 2019 05:13:43 GMT
Hi

I have already used this way. I feel local NFS mount point adds another
layer over local storage and can affect IO speed and performance. What do
you think of it? What about SharedMountPoint option? Between this and local
NFS which one offers better performance?

Thanks

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 5:38 AM Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev_ia@bw-sw.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As for 4.11.2, no way to have multiple local storages configured for a
> single host. There is no simple way to overcome it. The only one I see is a
> pretty ugly - locally mounted NFS, created as a cluster wide storage when
> only a single host added to a single cluster...
>
> In short, it's not supported, only one local storage per host. It's a great
> feature request, but unsure many people use that topology.
>
> чт, 18 июл. 2019 г., 4:04 Fariborz Navidan <mdvlinquest@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a few mount points which refer to different block devices on local
> > machine. I am trying to add them as additional primary local storage  to
> > CS, Unfortunately, when adding primary storage there is no Filesystem
> > option to choose. As a result I have managed to modify the storage_pool
> > table settting the storage type to Filesystem. Then shows its state as
> > "Up". However it because the path is under / such as /home and / is on
> > different disk, it mistakenly detects the storage capcity as it is for
> root
> > filesystem and not the real size of filesystem /home belongs to.
> >
> > Any idea how to fix this?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message