From users-return-33060-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@cloudstack.apache.org Tue Jun 25 10:45:09 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C984C18062F for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:45:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 7543 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2019 10:45:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 7530 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2019 10:45:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:45:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id AF65EC22F2 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:45:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.8 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LWtoy-t062Rk for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ed1-f52.google.com (mail-ed1-f52.google.com [209.85.208.52]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C9E645FBD6 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f52.google.com with SMTP id s49so26505561edb.1 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 03:45:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WdbpzZl39HgOeArx42nwR6AZ32M4fumJJ3kGNN3QWck=; b=RaXlqdpgfVNWVfVSWoInAPjgQQeNcm/QI1Te6aDwqfbJyKKsJ9va0Jx81cdtu35DaR QU/JbWBR4SSP1N43FxLyjuGo8KJdPqt9+sbcSjnBwLnw53KgRrI0DzEpzTXpdAX1xVxq TKqFfNmt3E/jptMWtmcI4xyRPSkdGlPYrXuIU8R767tDN3AEAcxAJ8UPlYbiM60vxggf 3WD2Lwp/rFTCl7x+7ciOA0G+1hW7YBTj0H7YJ7upH/sni53csV1sTOnKgZynx0bOLI+v DjFfIcEtbWLuf0WXNCDQousAg2bmz5m2DaqdU8zF3eYqcsDtdqPenFqgqUzs0m8Uiqlb 6vlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=WdbpzZl39HgOeArx42nwR6AZ32M4fumJJ3kGNN3QWck=; b=HT5bYnaUCVJThCe5fmJzGlmhKaesbPL6xj0ak1/ePCGQKwpxcB8MOeYL1V+IIjbqFp aLoKk3XxaMKt7PeTDXfTK1wfc1C+xB6ZA/g/o/vyTqMoy/DESyVpbh+TDgid3ahWDUd+ SHvHJZYF0WpTkfz1AC+cwxyTtjaFLsD93vxZjqp4oF7+33D3yYZFtrfk6x4VD6dYtl+n D4o2bU7sUoAJHMqLxMJdWnUbPthdrwbejN3AXJa4w70aiuy6aSzNUM4JwVWoPNmP6t56 MyVkqFlNAziI8Szy28gr0B+iPu0mM7NYQW4rkwalBAPj8gWo7q07yaJZPxtja/TMOTsO c95g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU2tQAkNuu9ToeR0O71EJ1Xt559Wha92uVfAUW15sUcMakYphCG 1GDWawWGEcOyJWe1sv9PHWvLoNiO8K1IN8HwZ08aYkI1 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwXhyLmieneaKURNLsM1bLboXSDDE1Jryhntzwj+fEZnFuxERW5q8ELNpESOmblFYlr71aG4/J0cBJOzyZbbXU= X-Received: by 2002:a50:fa96:: with SMTP id w22mr71995404edr.45.1561459495127; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 03:44:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <851e753d-24c1-2529-8ce5-002aa5aa41f6@schokokeks.org> In-Reply-To: From: Andrija Panic Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:44:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Very BIG mess with networking To: users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000089d70d058c239ef3" --00000000000089d70d058c239ef3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I would say, to make sure you have identical network/bond setup as before (irrelevant of which chils pifs are in the bond/network) - so from CloudStack point of view, you did zero changes (same networks/bind). Limited reading capabilities from myside on mobile...but I would say that pluging in the vif for a guest Network is the problem - in XenServer logs, you can clearly see error while joining slave interface (vif) to the network - but again, not sure which network is it (public or guest Network) On Tue, Jun 25, 2019, 10:50 Alessandro Caviglione wrote: > No, new bond have the same name... > In the log there is: > > Found more than one network with the name Public > 2019-06-25 00:14:35,802 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.XsLocalNetwork] > (DirectAgent-35:ctx-c5073156) (logid:0d9e7907) *Found a network called > Public on host=192.168.200.39; > Network=9fa48b75-d68e-feaf-2eb4-8a7340f8c89b; > pif=ca4c1679-fa36-bc93-37de-28a74ddc4f2c* > 2019-06-25 00:14:35,807 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] > (DirectAgent-35:ctx-c5073156) (logid:0d9e7907) Created a vif > dfaab3d7-7921-e4d5-ba27-537e8d549a5c on 2 > 2019-06-25 00:14:35,807 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] > (DirectAgent-35:ctx-c5073156) (logid:0d9e7907) Creating VIF for r-899-VM on > nic [Nic:Guest-10.122.12.1-vlan://384] > 2019-06-25 00:14:35,809 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] > (DirectAgent-35:ctx-c5073156) (logid:0d9e7907) Looking for network named > GuestVM > 2019-06-25 00:14:35,825 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.XsLocalNetwork] > (DirectAgent-35:ctx-c5073156) (logid:0d9e7907) Found a network called > GuestVM on host=192.168.200.39; > Network=300e55f0-88ff-a460-e498-e75424bc292a; > pif=b67841c5-6361-0dbf-a63d-a3e9c1b9f2fc > > So it seems that, however, it get the right Network and continue to looking > for other network. > Do you think this is the issue also if CS continue with other tasks instead > stops founding more than one network Public? > Could I simply change network name in Xen Pool and update in CS? > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:52 AM Andrija Panic > wrote: > > > If your new bond have changes name, have you changed also XenServer > Traffic > > Label in CloudStack ? > > Active-active is known to be sometimes very problematic, switch back to > > active-passive until you solve your issues. Experiment later with > > active-active. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019, 09:34 Michael Kesper > wrote: > > > > > Hi Alessandro, > > > > > > On 25.06.19 08:43, Alessandro Caviglione wrote: > > > > complains on more than one network with name Publci... ??? > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > >> 2019-06-25 00:14:35,792 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] > > > >> (DirectAgent-35:ctx-c5073156) (logid:0d9e7907) Looking for network > > named > > > >> Public > > > >> 2019-06-25 00:14:35,793 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] > > > >> (DirectAgent-35:ctx-c5073156) (logid:0d9e7907) Found more than one > > > > network > > > >> with the name Public > > > > > > Bye > > > Michael > > > > > > > > > > > > --00000000000089d70d058c239ef3--