From users-return-32599-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@cloudstack.apache.org Mon Apr 8 13:28:41 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B60B4180627 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:28:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 87289 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2019 13:09:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 87278 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2019 13:09:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 13:09:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CEE4BC00A6 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:28:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.299 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SueVVHbg3H0Y for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx-relay34-hz1.antispameurope.com (mx-relay34-hz1.antispameurope.com [94.100.133.210]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1037F6253F for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-mtaDD25.fraunhofer.de ([192.102.167.25]) by mx-relay34-hz1.antispameurope.com; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 15:28:19 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C3BABaS6tc/ytAYJllHgEGBwaBZYE?= =?us-ascii?q?PL4I+MYx/pw0QhGwChgc4EgEBAwEBCQECAQJtKIVBgRsBCwEefAEEG4QsYwK?= =?us-ascii?q?vCIokgTCNXYFXgh6CA4MXGEuCboImA5FBbJNZBwKBKVyKSIdQi1OJCZ95gWY?= =?us-ascii?q?hgVZxgzyQSz8Bj3+BIAEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,325,1549926000"; d="scan'208,217";a="41619561" Received: from zv-srv-excaht04.zv.fraunhofer.de (HELO mobile.zentrale.zv.fhg.de) ([153.96.64.43]) by mail-mtaDD25.fraunhofer.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 08 Apr 2019 15:28:13 +0200 Received: from ZV-SRV-EXCN00.zentrale.zv.fhg.de ([fe80::4529:950:d3f5:46af]) by zv-srv-excaht04.zentrale.zv.fhg.de ([fe80::9030:e90f:a9e4:cf28%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:28:12 +0200 From: To: Subject: Assess job queues and their load balancing on management servers Thread-Topic: Assess job queues and their load balancing on management servers Thread-Index: AdTuDum498G3rECpSjSeLpX68Mlq8g== Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:28:11 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.204.22.110] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A8771E4519022C438AF26C48D14F3AB24761EDzvsrvexcn00zentra_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-cloud-security-sender:peter.muryshkin@zv.fraunhofer.de X-cloud-security-recipient:users@cloudstack.apache.org X-cloud-security-Virusscan:CLEAN X-cloud-security-disclaimer: This E-Mail was scanned by E-Mailservice on mx-relay34-hz1.antispameurope.com with 5267D1C206D X-cloud-security-connect: mail-mtaDD25.fraunhofer.de[192.102.167.25], TLS=1, IP=192.102.167.25 X-cloud-security:scantime:2.185 --_000_A8771E4519022C438AF26C48D14F3AB24761EDzvsrvexcn00zentra_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, all, in our setup (CS 4.10) we have noticed that one of two CS management server= s have very long prosecsing time (over 10 minutes, after that we consider i= t as timeout) but both servers are active. While our working assumption is that the job queue of the problem server ge= ts too long i.e. the load distribution does not work properly - how to asse= ss and configure this job load balancing? kind regards Peter --_000_A8771E4519022C438AF26C48D14F3AB24761EDzvsrvexcn00zentra_--