cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Swastik Mittal <mittal.swas...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: systemvm
Date Wed, 04 Apr 2018 10:39:13 GMT
@Stephen

Request to internal server mentioned in the global sec.storage.. after
registering the iso successfully, get's stuck on HEAD request. As you
mentioned there is an issue in route path from SSVM. Not able to
figure out how do I find it.

regards
Swastik

On 4/4/18, Swastik Mittal <mittal.swastik@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey @Stephen
>
> I am able to ping my management from ssvm. Also wget to internal
> server works fine, it took some time to establish connection
> initially.
>
> I don't have any ssvm-check.sh file. I forgot to mention it on this thread.
>
> Outputs:
>
> root@s-1-VM:~# ip a s
> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
>     link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
>     inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 0e:00:a9:fe:02:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 169.254.2.42/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global eth0
> 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 1e:00:ce:00:00:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 10.1.0.43/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth1
> 4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 1e:00:a1:00:00:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 10.1.0.191/24 brd 10.1.0.255 scope global eth2
>
>
> root@s-1-VM:~# ip r s
> default via 10.1.0.2 dev eth2
> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.1.0.43
> 10.1.0.0/24 dev eth2  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.1.0.191
> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 169.254.2.42
>
> Yes, my storage and management are the same.
>
> root@s-1-VM:~# route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags  Metric Ref    Use
> Iface
> 0.0.0.0           10.1.0.2           0.0.0.0            UG      0
> 0        0    eth2
> 10.1.0.0          0.0.0.0           255.255.255.0    U       0      0
>       0    eth1
> 10.1.0.0          0.0.0.0           255.255.255.0    U       0      0
>       0    eth2
> 169.254.0.0     0.0.0.0           255.255.0.0       U       0      0
>      0    eth0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 4/4/18, Stephan Seitz <s.seitz@heinlein-support.de> wrote:
>> Hu!
>>
>> I'ld recommend to log in to your ssvm and check if everything is able
>> to connect.
>>
>> I second dag's suggestion to double check your network setup.
>>
>> Inside your ssvm I'ld run
>>
>> /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
>>
>> also
>>
>> ip a s
>> ip r s
>>
>>
>> As an educated guess: did you setup your storage-network to the same
>> cidr as your management-network?
>>
>> if yes, maybe the default route inside your ssvm is setup wrong (on the
>> wrong NIC or errenously set up twice on two NICs)
>>
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> - Stephan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2018, 13:53 +0530 schrieb Swastik Mittal:
>>> @Dag
>>>
>>> By legacy I meant one way ssl. I have set ca strictness for client as
>>> false.
>>>
>>> I am using 1 nic common for all the network, that is one bridge
>>> serving
>>> both public and private network.
>>>
>>> I am setting up a basic zone so I set my management within ip range
>>> of 10
>>> and guest within a range of 100, and my statement vms get ip assigned
>>> within those ranges successfully.
>>>
>>> I used these similar configuration with ACL 4.6 and was able to run
>>> vm's
>>> successfully.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Swastik
>>>
>>> On 4 Apr 2018 1:44 p.m., "Dag Sonstebo" <Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Swastik,
>>> >
>>> > Your issue is most likely with your network configuration rather
>>> > than
>>> > anything to do with firewalls or system VM templates.
>>> >
>>> > First of all – what do you mean by legacy mode? Are you referring
>>> > to
>>> > advanced or basic zone?
>>> >
>>> > Secondly – can you tell us how you have configured your networking?
>>> >
>>> > - How many NICs you are using and how have you configured them
>>> > - What management vs public IP ranges you are using
>>> > - How you have mapped your networking in CloudStack against the
>>> > underlying
>>> > hardware NICs
>>> > - Can you also check what your “host” global setting is set to
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Dag Sonstebo
>>> > Cloud Architect
>>> > ShapeBlue
>>> >
>>> > On 04/04/2018, 09:07, "Swastik Mittal" <mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     @jagdish
>>> >
>>> >     Yes I was using the same link.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
>>> > www.shapeblue.com
>>> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>>> > @shapeblue
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 4 Apr 2018 1:07 p.m., "Jagdish Patil" <jagdishpatil316@gmail.com
>>> > >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     > Hey Swastik,
>>> >     >
>>> >     > download.cloudstack.org link doesn't look like an issue, but
>>> > which
>>> > version
>>> >     > and which hypervisor are you using?
>>> >     >
>>> >     > For KVM, download this:
>>> >     > http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/systemvmtemplat
>>> > e-4.11.0-kvm.
>>> >     > qcow2.bz2
>>> >     >
>>> >     > Regards,
>>> >     > Jagdish Patil
>>> >     >
>>> >     > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:00 PM Swastik Mittal <
>>> > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
>>> >     > wrote:
>>> >     >
>>> >     > > Hey @jagdish
>>> >     > >
>>> >     > > I was using download.cloudstack.org to download systemVM.
>>> > Is
>>> > there any
>>> >     > > bug within the template uploaded here?
>>> >     > >
>>> >     > > @Soundar
>>> >     > >
>>> >     > > I did disable firewall services but din't work. I'll check
>>> > it again
>>> >     > though.
>>> >     > >
>>> >     > > On 4/4/18, soundar rajan <bsoundarajan@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> >     > > > disabled firewalld service on the hostname and check.
you
>>> > should
>>> > able
>>> >     > to
>>> >     > > > access using console window.
>>> >     > > >
>>> >     > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Swastik Mittal <
>>> >     > > mittal.swastik@gmail.com>
>>> >     > > > wrote:
>>> >     > > >
>>> >     > > >> Hey,
>>> >     > > >>
>>> >     > > >> I am installing ACS 4.11 (legacy mode), with
management
>>> > and
>>> > host on
>>> >     > same
>>> >     > > >> server and out-of-band management disabled. My
host is
>>> > enabled
>>> > and up
>>> >     > > and
>>> >     > > >> ssvm successfully running. Though agent state
column
>>> > shows only
>>> > '-'.
>>> >     > > >>
>>> >     > > >> CPVM is also running successfully but when I
open
>>> > console
>>> > window I get
>>> >     > > >> unable to connect. Also I din't find check file
in SSVM
>>> > (accessed
>>> >     > > through
>>> >     > > >> terminal using ssh).
>>> >     > > >>
>>> >     > > >> From SSVM I can ssh into management but wget
command to
>>> > management
>>> >     > local
>>> >     > > >> host ain't working (is stuck at connecting but
is not
>>> > able to
>>> >     > connect.).
>>> >     > > >>
>>> >     > > >> Agent log does not show any error, just mentions
"trying
>>> > to
>>> > fetch
>>> >     > > storage
>>> >     > > >> pool from libvirt" all the time. I checked my
storage
>>> > pool
>>> > through
>>> >     > > "virsh
>>> >     > > >> pool-list" and it shows the storage pool mentioned
in
>>> > local
>>> > storage
>>> >     > > under
>>> >     > > >> agent.properties.
>>> >     > > >>
>>> >     > > >> Any ideas?
>>> >     > > >>
>>> >     > > >> Regards
>>> >     > > >> Swastik
>>> >     > > >>
>>> >     > > >
>>> >     > >
>>> >     >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>> --
>>
>> Heinlein Support GmbH
>> Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
>>
>> http://www.heinlein-support.de
>>
>> Tel: 030 / 405051-44
>> Fax: 030 / 405051-19
>>
>> Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht
>> Berlin-Charlottenburg,
>> Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message