cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Asanka Gunasekara <asa...@nimbus.lk>
Subject Re: Secondary storage is not secondary properly
Date Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:17:43 GMT
Hi Dag, the ip 172.17.101.1 which it is looking for is my gateway IP. Below
are the urls for the the requested query output files

SELECT * FROM cloud.image_store;

http://wikisend.com/download/727732/01.htm

SELECT id,name,url,state FROM cloud.vm_template where type='SYSTEM';

http://wikisend.com/download/229028/02.htm

Thank you and best regards

Asanka

On 17 August 2017 at 15:47, Dag Sonstebo <Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Hi Asanka,
>
> This looks odd – your SSVM is connecting to your management server but as
> far as I can see it is still trying to connect to the wrong NFS server.
>
> Can you give me the output from the following MySQL queries:
>
> SELECT * FROM cloud.image_store;
>
> SELECT id,name,url,state FROM cloud.vm_template where type='SYSTEM';
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>  S: +44 20 3603 0540  | dag.sonstebo@shapeblue.com |
> http://www.shapeblue.com <http://www.shapeblue.com/> | Twitter:@ShapeBlue
> <https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue>
>
>
> On 17/08/2017, 07:41, "Asanka Gunasekara" <asanka@nimbus.lk> wrote:
>
>     Hi Dag, still the error persists, please find the screen shot url
>
>     https://snag.gy/xecXiP.jpg
>
>     Could it be the cloudstack version that I am using, since the vmware
>     support is not built in to the download cloudstack provided, I used
> below
>     url but the system vm template is from cloudstack
>
>     http://www.shapeblue.com/packages/
>
>     Thanks and Reagrds
>
>     Asanka
>
>
> Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> On 17 August 2017 at 11:37, Asanka Gunasekara <asanka@nimbus.lk> wrote:
>
>     > Thank you,  Rodrigo
>     >
>     > Best Regards
>     >
>     > Asanka
>     >
>     > On 15 August 2017 at 23:04, Rodrigo Baldasso <
> rodrigo@loophost.com.br>
>     > wrote:
>     >
>     >> Put the zone in maitenance mode, that will not auto create the
> ssvm's.
>     >>
>     >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>     >>
>     >> Rodrigo Baldasso - LHOST
>     >>
>     >> (51) 9 8419-9861
>     >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>     >> On 15/08/2017 14:00:45, Asanka Gunasekara <asanka@nimbus.lk> wrote:
>     >> Hi Dag, restart did not work but updating the tables initiate the
>     >> recreation of the system VMs. But it does not give me the chance to
>     >> restart
>     >> cloudstack server, as soon as destroy the VMs it starts the VM
> recreation.
>     >> Is there a way to stop this behaviour
>     >>
>     >> Thanks and Regards
>     >>
>     >> Asanka
>     >>
>     >> On 15 August 2017 at 14:19, Asanka Gunasekara wrote:
>     >>
>     >> > Thank you Dag
>     >> >
>     >> > Best Regards
>     >> >
>     >> > Asanka
>     >> >
>     >> > On 15 August 2017 at 13:18, Dag Sonstebo
>     >> > wrote:
>     >> >
>     >> >> Hi Asanka,
>     >> >>
>     >> >> Maybe give you management server a reboot first of all.
>     >> >>
>     >> >> If this fails then yes we sometimes set status to stopped or
> destroyed
>     >> in
>     >> >> the DB – you also need to set the removed date and last update
> date.
>     >> >>
>     >> >> Regards,
>     >> >> Dag Sonstebo
>     >> >> Cloud Architect
>     >> >> ShapeBlue
>     >> >>
>     >> >> On 15/08/2017, 07:07, "Asanka Gunasekara" wrote:
>     >> >>
>     >> >> Hi Guys, what would happen if i change the column in the table
>     >> >> VM_instance,
>     >> >> to Destroyed or running
>     >> >>
>     >> >> :(
>     >> >>
>     >> >> On 15 Aug 2017 8:28 am, "Asanka Gunasekara" wrote:
>     >> >>
>     >> >> > Hi Guys, when a system VM is in start state in ui, it does
not
> give
>     >> >> any
>     >> >> > option to delete stop start etc. What if it to change db entry
> of
>     >> >> the
>     >> >> > system VMS to running state. Will it give me the option to
> destroy?
>     >> >> If so
>     >> >> > what would be the database relation?
>     >> >> >
>     >> >> > Thanks and regards
>     >> >> >
>     >> >> > Asanka
>     >> >> >
>     >> >> > On 15 Aug 2017 6:42 am, "Asanka Gunasekara"
>     >> >> wrote:
>     >> >> >
>     >> >> >> Hi Dag, I deleted both the system VMs and from the cloudstack
> it
>     >> >> says
>     >> >> >> starting but I dont see the the VM been generated, now
its
> since
>     >> >> more than
>     >> >> >> 12 houres
>     >> >> >>
>     >> >> >> Thanks and Regards
>     >> >> >>
>     >> >> >> Asanka
>     >> >> >>
>     >> >> >
>     >> >> Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
>     >> >> www.shapeblue.com
>     >> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
>     >> >> @shapeblue
>     >> >>
>     >> >>
>     >> >>
>     >> >> > On 10 August 2017 at 21:47, Asanka Gunasekara wrote:
>     >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> Thank you Dag,
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> On 10 Aug 2017 3:09 am, "Dag Sonstebo"
>     >> >> Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com>
>     >> >> >>> wrote:
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> Sure, let us know how you get on. The fact that the
previous
> ssvm
>     >> >> check
>     >> >> >>> showed up with 172.17.101.1 was probably down to the
wrong
> “host”
>     >> >> global
>     >> >> >>> setting – since the SSVM didn’t know where to
contact
> management
>     >> >> I would
>     >> >> >>> guess it used a default override.
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> Regards,
>     >> >> >>> Dag Sonstebo
>     >> >> >>> Cloud Architect
>     >> >> >>> ShapeBlue
>     >> >> >>> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | dag.sonstebo@shapeblue.com |
>     >> >> >>> http://www.shapeblue.com |
>     >> >> >>> Twitter:@ShapeBlue
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> On 09/08/2017, 17:54, "Asanka Gunasekara"
>     >> >> wrote:
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> Hi Dag, pleas give me few days as I am on an implementation
>     >> >> visit to
>     >> >> >>> a
>     >> >> >>> remote site. But below are some of the test I performed
>     >> >> before.
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> 1. Ping from ssvm to NFS is possible
>     >> >> >>> 2. Manually mounting NFS to /tmp/secondary is possible
>     >> >> without any
>     >> >> >>> Issy
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> From the previous run of the ssvm check it is looking
for a
>     >> >> serve IP
>     >> >> >>> 172.17.101.1. Where registered NFS share is 172.17.101.253
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> I will run the check again on the first chance I get
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> Thank you and best regards
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> Asanka
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> On 9 Aug 2017 12:55 pm, "Dag Sonstebo"
>     >> >> Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com>
>     >> >> >>> wrote:
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> OK , can you post up the results of the ssvm check
again?
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> As suggested previously on this thread – can you
try to
>     >> >> >>> 1) Ping the NFS server from the SSVM (SSVM check does
this as
>     >> >> well)
>     >> >> >>> – if
>     >> >> >>> this doesn’t work then you have a networking issue.
>     >> >> >>> 2) Depending on ping - manually mount the secondary
NFS share
>     >> >> on
>     >> >> >>> your SSVM.
>     >> >> >>> If this doesn’t work then you need to investigate
the logs at
>     >> >> the
>     >> >> >>> NFS end
>     >> >> >>> to see why the NFS handshake fails.
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> Regards,
>     >> >> >>> Dag Sonstebo
>     >> >> >>> Cloud Architect
>     >> >> >>> ShapeBlue
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> On 08/08/2017, 19:14, "Asanka Gunasekara"
>     >> >> wrote:
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> Hi Dag
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> After changing localhost to management server ip oin
>     >> >> global
>     >> >> >>> configuration I
>     >> >> >>> dont see the management server error. But the NFS
error
>     >> >> still
>     >> >> >>> persist
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> Thanks and Regards
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> Asanka
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
>     >> >> >>> www.shapeblue.com
>     >> >> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
>     >> >> >>> @shapeblue
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
>     >> >> >>> www.shapeblue.com
>     >> >> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
>     >> >> >>> @shapeblue
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> On 8 August 2017 at 23:33, Asanka Gunasekara
>     >> >> wrote:
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>> > Hi Dag, thanks for reply
>     >> >> >>> >
>     >> >> >>> > Did the change and the VMs are being rebuilt
>     >> >> >>> >
>     >> >> >>> > NFS server configuration, I took this from the
>     >> >> installation
>     >> >> >>> guied
>     >> >> >>> >
>     >> >> >>> > [root@share ~]# cat /etc/exports
>     >> >> >>> > /share_smb/export/secondary
>     >> >> *(rw,async,no_root_squash,no_
>     >> >> >>> subtree_check)
>     >> >> >>> > /share_smb/export/primary *(rw,async,no_root_squash,no_s
>     >> >> >>> ubtree_check)
>     >> >> >>> > [root@share ~]#
>     >> >> >>> >
>     >> >> >>> >
>     >> >> >>> > On 8 August 2017 at 17:06, Dag Sonstebo
>     >> >> >>> Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com>
>     >> >> >>> > wrote:
>     >> >> >>> >
>     >> >> >>> >> Hi Asanka,
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> Can you change your “host” global setting
to your
>     >> >> management
>     >> >> >>> server
>     >> >> >>> IP
>     >> >> >>> >> (it’s currently set to “localhost”),
restart your
>     >> >> management
>     >> >> >>> service
>     >> >> >>> and
>     >> >> >>> >> then destroy your SSVM + let this recreate.
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> Once done run the check again and let us
know the
>     >> >> outcome.
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> Can you also show us the configuration of
your NFS
>     >> >> share –
>     >> >> >>> i.e. what
>     >> >> >>> >> parameters are set etc.
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> Regards,
>     >> >> >>> >> Dag Sonstebo
>     >> >> >>> >> Cloud Architect
>     >> >> >>> >> ShapeBlue
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> On 08/08/2017, 10:28, "Asanka Gunasekara"
>     >> >> asanka@nimbus.lk>
>     >> >> >>> wrote:
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> Hi Guys,
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> ssvm-check.sh command output
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> https://snag.gy/bzpE5n.jpg
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> Details of my nfs share
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> https://snag.gy/WgJxCY.jpg
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> Thanks and Best Regards
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> Asanka
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
>     >> >> >>> >> www.shapeblue.com
>     >> >> >>> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N
4HSUK
>     >> >> >>> >> @shapeblue
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> On 8 August 2017 at 14:48, Asanka Gunasekara
>     >> >> >>> asanka@nimbus.lk>
>     >> >> >>> wrote:
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> > Thanks Makrand
>     >> >> >>> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> > On 8 August 2017 at 14:42, Makrand
>     >> >> >>> makrandsanap@gmail.com>
>     >> >> >>> wrote:
>     >> >> >>> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> >> Asanka,
>     >> >> >>> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> The email list blocks the screen
shots. I guess
>     >> >> no one
>     >> >> >>> in the
>     >> >> >>> list
>     >> >> >>> >> can see
>     >> >> >>> >> >> your posted screens in emal chain.
>     >> >> >>> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> Better paste text output of the
result or upload
>     >> >> >>> screens to
>     >> >> >>> image
>     >> >> >>> >> hosting
>     >> >> >>> >> >> (e.g. snag.gy).
>     >> >> >>> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> --
>     >> >> >>> >> >> Makrand
>     >> >> >>> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 2:28 PM,
Asanka
>     >> >> Gunasekara
>     >> >> >>> >> asanka@nimbus.lk>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> wrote:
>     >> >> >>> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> > Hi Guys, thanks for replying
buy running
>     >> >> >>> ssvm-check.sh I got
>     >> >> >>> >> below
>     >> >> >>> >> >> output
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> >> > [image: Inline images 1]
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> >> > My nfs is 172.17.101.253 but
it is looking for
>     >> >> >>> 172.17.101.1
>     >> >> >>> >> which is the
>     >> >> >>> >> >> > gateway and the Management
server is
>     >> >> 172.17.101.248
>     >> >> >>> but it
>     >> >> >>> is
>     >> >> >>> >> looking
>     >> >> >>> >> >> in to
>     >> >> >>> >> >> > Loval host
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> >> > [image: Inline images 2]
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> >> > What is going on, have I done
something wrong?
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> >> > On 8 August 2017 at 14:22,
Dag Sonstebo
>     >> >> >>> >> Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> > wrote:
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Hi Asanka,
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> One quick thing to check
– log in to your
>     >> >> SSVM and
>     >> >> >>> run
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> /use/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
–
>     >> >> this
>     >> >> >>> will tell
>     >> >> >>> you
>     >> >> >>> >> if the
>     >> >> >>> >> >> SSVM
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> can mount and write to
secondary storage.
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Regards,
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Dag Sonstebo
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Cloud Architect
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> ShapeBlue
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> From: Asanka Gunasekara
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org"
>     >> >> >>> >> users@cloudstack.apache.org>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Date: Tuesday, 8 August
2017 at 09:27
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org"
>     >> >> >>> users@cloudstack.apache.org>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Secondary
storage is not
>     >> >> secondary
>     >> >> >>> properly
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> I am sorry Eric, thank
you for replying,
>     >> >> please see
>     >> >> >>> below
>     >> >> >>> for
>     >> >> >>> >> the rest
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> results
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> * Make sure that it's accessible
from the
>     >> >> *storage*
>     >> >> >>> network (the
>     >> >> >>> >> >> network
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> that you configured as
storage when you
>     >> >> created the
>     >> >> >>> zone,
>     >> >> >>> >> assuming you
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> selected advanced networking).
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Asanka > Since this
is a test environemt I
>     >> >> have
>     >> >> >>> just made
>     >> >> >>> it
>     >> >> >>> >> all in one
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> subnet (is that the issue)
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> * Is the secondary storage
virtual machine
>     >> >> up and
>     >> >> >>> running?
>     >> >> >>> >> Check your
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Infrastructure tab.
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Asanka > Yes both system
VMs are up and
>     >> >> running
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> * If the secondary storage
virtual machine
>     >> >> is up and
>     >> >> >>> running,
>     >> >> >>> >> open its
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> console and log in as root
/ password. Then
>     >> >> check
>     >> >> >>> 'ip addr
>     >> >> >>> >> list' to
>     >> >> >>> >> >> make
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> sure that it has IP addresses.
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Asanka > Yes it IP are
assigned
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> * If it has IP addresses,
try pinging your
>     >> >> secondary
>     >> >> >>> storage
>     >> >> >>> >> NFS server
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> (still within the SSVM).
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Asanka > I can ping
secondary storage
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> * If you can ping your
secondary storage NFS
>     >> >> >>> server, try
>     >> >> >>> >> mounting the
>     >> >> >>> >> >> NFS
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> share at some random place
in your
>     >> >> filesystem to
>     >> >> >>> make sure
>     >> >> >>> you
>     >> >> >>> >> can
>     >> >> >>> >> >> mount it
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> from the SSVM. e.g., 'mkdir
/tmp/t; mount
>     >> >> >>> >> myserver:/export/secstorage
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> /tmp/t'
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Asanka > I can mount
the secondary storage
>     >> >> as below
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> [nline images 1]
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> www.shapeblue.com
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent
Garden, London
>     >> >> WC2N 4HSUK
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> @shapeblue
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> On 8 August 2017 at 12:54,
Eric Green
>     >> >> >>> eric.lee.green@gmail.com
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> to:
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> eric.lee.green@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> > On Aug 7, 2017, at
23:44, Asanka
>     >> >> Gunasekara
>     >> >> >>> asanka@nimbus.lk
>     >> >> >>> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> asanka@nimbus.lk>>
wrote:
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> > NFS is running on
a different server, I can
>     >> >> >>> manual mount
>     >> >> >>> this
>     >> >> >>> >> share
>     >> >> >>> >> >> as
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> NFS
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> > and SMB
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> > Cloud stack - 4.9
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> > Os is Centos 7 (64)
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> * Make sure that it's accessible
from the
>     >> >> *storage*
>     >> >> >>> network (the
>     >> >> >>> >> >> network
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> that you configured as
storage when you
>     >> >> created the
>     >> >> >>> zone,
>     >> >> >>> >> assuming you
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> selected advanced networking).
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> * Is the secondary storage
virtual machine
>     >> >> up and
>     >> >> >>> running?
>     >> >> >>> >> Check your
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> Infrastructure tab.
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> * If the secondary storage
virtual machine
>     >> >> is up and
>     >> >> >>> running,
>     >> >> >>> >> open its
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> console and log in as root
/ password. Then
>     >> >> check
>     >> >> >>> 'ip addr
>     >> >> >>> >> list' to
>     >> >> >>> >> >> make
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> sure that it has IP addresses.
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> * If it has IP addresses,
try pinging your
>     >> >> secondary
>     >> >> >>> storage
>     >> >> >>> >> NFS server
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> (still within the SSVM).
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> * If you can ping your
secondary storage NFS
>     >> >> >>> server, try
>     >> >> >>> >> mounting the
>     >> >> >>> >> >> NFS
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> share at some random place
in your
>     >> >> filesystem to
>     >> >> >>> make sure
>     >> >> >>> you
>     >> >> >>> >> can
>     >> >> >>> >> >> mount it
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> from the SSVM. e.g., 'mkdir
/tmp/t; mount
>     >> >> >>> >> myserver:/export/secstorage
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> /tmp/t'
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> * Make sure you're using
the NFS server's
>     >> >> *storage*
>     >> >> >>> network IP
>     >> >> >>> >> address
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> when you make this attempt.
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> It is possible that your
NFS server has a
>     >> >> firewall
>     >> >> >>> configured?
>     >> >> >>> >> But from
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> my experiments, the secondary
storage VM not
>     >> >> >>> providing
>     >> >> >>> secondary
>     >> >> >>> >> >> storage
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> usually is a networking
problem, things not
>     >> >> set up
>     >> >> >>> properly in
>     >> >> >>> >> your
>     >> >> >>> >> >> zone's
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> networking so that the
secondary storage VM
>     >> >> can't
>     >> >> >>> reach the
>     >> >> >>> >> secondary
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >> storage. Are you using
advanced networking,
>     >> >> or basic
>     >> >> >>> networking?
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> >>
>     >> >> >>> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >> >
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >>
>     >> >> >>> >
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>>
>     >> >> >>
>     >> >>
>     >> >>
>     >> >>
>     >> >
>     >>
>     >
>     >
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message