Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
From: Simon Weller <sweller@ena.com.INVALID>
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: KVM VM Snapshots
Thread-Topic: KVM VM Snapshots
Thread-Index: AQHS+cZCRKxmYgm4m0i+0JrPTkPncKJNmJeAgAAioRWAAA8PgIAA446e
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:21:29 +0000
Message-ID: <BN6PR02MB33311BDE5D52F3DF03F7BFCFA9AE0@BN6PR02MB3331.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <a2f69f80-1ec6-9521-1d73-1bc673964722@globalchangemusic.org>
 <0ef57c34-b9ce-4e04-ad8f-035ff97a2385@globalchangemusic.org>
 <BN6PR02MB3331774D464DD1B5715B8AAFA9A90@BN6PR02MB3331.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>,<CALFNC1Q+KZAxJ9QqcJ0_6jEiyhCJx3G8ccNLpKhOgBVxwthh0Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALFNC1Q+KZAxJ9QqcJ0_6jEiyhCJx3G8ccNLpKhOgBVxwthh0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_000_BN6PR02MB33311BDE5D52F3DF03F7BFCFA9AE0BN6PR02MB3331namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Jul 2017 14:21:29.5731
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 6dc38cd4-4d4f-4826-9649-17854289d170
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR02MB3332
X-ENA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@ena.com for more information
X-ENA-MailScanner-ID: DAF6D148011D.A0AF6
X-ENA-MailScanner: No viruses found
X-ENA-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-7.7,
	required 4, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -1.90, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10,
	DKIM_VALID -0.10, DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10, DKIM_VALID_EF -0.10,
	ENA_TRUST_FROM_AUTH -2.20, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, OS_WINDOWS 0.00,
	OS_WINDOWS7 0.20, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.20, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 -1.20,
	RCVD_IN_SENDERSCORE_90_100 -2.20, SPF_HELO_PASS -0.00,
	SPF_PASS -0.00)
X-ENA-MailScanner-From: sweller@ena.com
X-ENA-MailScanner-Watermark: 1500387692.03911@ITksCjkSA/5M1RfRCdPODA
archived-at: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:21:57 -0000

--_000_BN6PR02MB33311BDE5D52F3DF03F7BFCFA9AE0BN6PR02MB3331namp_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The new VM Snapshot functionality for KVM supports disk and memory snaps. T=
his means you can recover a VM to a port in time, so assuming that's what y=
ou are asking, yes it's hot.

It does rely on QCOW2 disk formats right now.


- Si


________________________________
From: Rubens Malheiro <rubens.malheiro@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:44 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: KVM VM Snapshots

Sorry to mess up
But a version 4.10 supported snapshot in KVM will it be hot?
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 21:28 Simon Weller <sweller@ena.com.invalid> wrote:

> Asai,
>
> 4.10 was approved last week. It should hit the repos with the next few
> days.
>
> - Si
>
> Simon Weller/615-312-6068
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Asai [asai@globalchangemusic.org]
> Received: Monday, 10 Jul 2017, 4:49PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org [users@cloudstack.apache.org]
> Subject: Re: KVM VM Snapshots
>
> Rather than 9.10 I meant 4.10.  Rather than 9.2 I meant 4.9.2. Sorry.
>
>
> On 7/10/2017 2:46 PM, Asai wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Back in January there was a push to integrate the KVM snapshotting
> > ability into the 9.10 trunk.  I think this did get merged in, but 9.10
> > doesn't seem to be anywhere near release yet, so wondering if the devs
> > can push the KVM snapshotting patch into the 9.2 trunk and release as
> > a minor update?
> >
> > Asai
> >
>
>

--_000_BN6PR02MB33311BDE5D52F3DF03F7BFCFA9AE0BN6PR02MB3331namp_--