Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
From: "Lotic Lists" <lists@lotic.com.br>
To: <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>,
	<users@cloudstack.apache.org>
References: <DB5PR07MB12054DE6FB03A6447A710371E9AA0@DB5PR07MB1205.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>,<5d3dba2df1c645b483b10d5c316cc1c4@IPPEXCH13MB1.ipp.corp> <DB5PR07MB1205FCCA88D8A20EBD764ACCE9AE0@DB5PR07MB1205.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>,<1024517600.3700.1499803051244@ox.pcextreme.nl> <DB5PR07MB120521EEF774AD2E389C7B6DE9AF0@DB5PR07MB1205.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB5PR07MB120521EEF774AD2E389C7B6DE9AF0@DB5PR07MB1205.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:17:36 -0300
Message-ID: <002001d2fbd2$0739ad10$15ad0730$@lotic.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: pt-br
Thread-Index: AQKEu+Eb+M/gU08catmLCi3MIaflVAIJXVpmAaVTDHwCvTpNwwHx+vJkoKs69JA=
archived-at: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:17:50 -0000

Hi Rohit.

I would suggest the 1829 [1]

It's a big problem with XenServer and more than 2 datadisks attached per =
VM (HVM)

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829=20


-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]=20
Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 11:42
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can =
freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have =
a release plan as soon as next week.


- Rohit

________________________________
From: Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>
Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi,

I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131

Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.

Wido

> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav =
<rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>:
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sean Lair <slair@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running =
all of these fixes for several months without issues.  The code changes =
are all very easy/small, but had a big impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs=20
> scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of=20
> S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work =

> after vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion =
around the next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a =
timeline, plans or dates to share but I would like to engage with the =
community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should consider =
for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes =
that are new feature, or enhancements but strictly =
blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes, and we can =
consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch =
(committed since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git =
log 4.9.2.0..4.9) and let us know if there is any change we should =
consider reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started =
backporting some fixes on the 4.9 branch, please go through the =
following PR and raise objections on changes/commits that we should not =
backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider =
reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>

rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com=20
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
 =20
=20