From users-return-28069-apmail-cloudstack-users-archive=cloudstack.apache.org@cloudstack.apache.org Wed May 3 15:09:57 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F44119166 for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 15:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34975 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2017 15:09:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 34152 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2017 15:09:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 34092 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2017 15:09:55 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 May 2017 15:09:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BCB68C692F; Wed, 3 May 2017 15:09:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.379 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mve5auV-3nUd; Wed, 3 May 2017 15:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (mail-oi0-f52.google.com [209.85.218.52]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 6EBE25F1BA; Wed, 3 May 2017 15:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id h4so30092743oib.3; Wed, 03 May 2017 08:09:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tRjFynAsrGD1onx6Zia/xusZ2lVchDP2ApsvwN26VRM=; b=iMmvsAgwJpdD8+ZL7hHS4cu7Zwm8pAGK+85UihK/TbwftecqOj83bzgiIc8lfgMXP5 iCAn8HT2x9L3z6EQSS7cuNQ7krbuTtXsKwU/BveYPtX7rd8ir0lczl95dBg71ODzyYHE 0wGDK871g0IlLFJcKOfcsULgZPRgFbTZyuhM081JDhfE/drFgSBw+HXzvOYgtaw4Y5OD qr+mhyKUZW3oCY8VX6Tq2/YzRjczc/VYzW8YQCqkQ0pPApfNPGoJk+Spor4WRzWauvTn /qzF8fOhfrP4+3kAzMFQHnZri5VQW6sTYKqlQsgRwi3x40GvJD/aSVYeloVq8LaUpBxY x0cw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tRjFynAsrGD1onx6Zia/xusZ2lVchDP2ApsvwN26VRM=; b=k5qHDBeIt1bFeJmA2cIn05+Y0k3YV3ov9yd8SBCT3jgTa8/tmSA34QUZiB2X/3fLlJ JBqoF+ee6+GYkouKLdSnC8zY9cjzRfe6CaxDfDcsglGlD43S/bH6d6qe3kfzLB8NtCz1 Wv7ZFQMmsoxEl1xArnN2o1hQspCjzdFN6VmckoNf09yvX3MedhXi6iAWE77i5vB8idYX Jiud7kdCY5VAMrRdhmMmjGow0n/VwpHG3B8baLcDpMKohWSmpfEjWzuscMsIkH0B+ed9 /Nk2l/Tl36H/r92Xru+Bju2LKzvmXdenGCXKU59R2rABvLwLM8+IfDdGbNbecBR1jljW h8ZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5EiM6/OPYVzTpuAsJEAV0mo28K9o0KjKEUhY7y05R389+y3fVB /hpenzhEjiOs7quHjStSBxGy4TYfG5ko X-Received: by 10.157.50.41 with SMTP id t41mr13778386otc.199.1493824189003; Wed, 03 May 2017 08:09:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.4.20 with HTTP; Wed, 3 May 2017 08:09:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrija Panic Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 17:09:48 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Private gateways - experience, anyone really using it ? To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" , "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f40304354a58247ed3054ea00c58 --f40304354a58247ed3054ea00c58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I'm interested to know if anyone is using private gatewyas in production, and what are your experience with it, any undocumented limitations, etc ? I dont see iif t supports vxlans (perhaps will try to test it myself) I really would appreciate any feedback. Thanks, --=20 Andrija Pani=C4=87 --f40304354a58247ed3054ea00c58--