cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com>
Subject Re: OVS Plugin
Date Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:11:06 GMT
I'd strongly suggest you consider using the native VXLAN support for KVM. It works extremely
well and we run it in production.


- Si




________________________________
From: Dag Sonstebo <Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 10:57 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: OVS Plugin

Hi Imran,

OVS is the same as GRE tunnelling, which you will have as an isolation method for guest networking
– see http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/networking/ovs-plugin.html.

Please let us know how you get on – especially how your hypervisor nodes cope with CPU load
once the GRE tunnels start growing in numbers (historically this has not scaled well).

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 13/04/2017, 21:37, "Imran Ahmed" <imran@eaxiom.net> wrote:

    Dear Team,

    I have setup cloudstack 4.9 with KVM hypervisor and advanced networking on
    CentOS7. Also we installed and setup openvswitch on the hypervisors (KVM)
    hosts.

    Below are traffic labels for kvm

    Cloudbr0  for management
    Cloudbr1 for guest
    Cloudbr2 for public

    After configuring the zone, pod , cluster, host, primary and secondary
    storages we wanted to enable the OVS plugin under service providers for the
    guest network.

    However OVS is not shown in the list.

    Please suggest what could be wrong here.

    Kind regards,

    Imran




Dag.Sonstebo@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message