Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900E0200B75 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2016 17:28:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 8EB3E160AB9; Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D44DB160AAB for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2016 17:28:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 85554 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2016 15:28:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 85537 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2016 15:28:53 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 15:28:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3A90CC021B for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:28:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UMi61OljhR1w for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f49.google.com (mail-vk0-f49.google.com [209.85.213.49]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0A5CD5F1F6 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j189so50978801vkc.2 for ; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 08:28:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=d13k5u57O3JTZPOlMkg7/kfE+A9aBhQ8rjkH1q7HKfU=; b=H6gKGGgG8Tfb32PXQxjXQEfcpZ1V7+vt62wlaOAKR/MkF1XuNDuah0KljHXJrDtsJ/ 2lFKUEEqa9ir9bLsyxfvG5F2xFf3pX/LumAnytTmC66TC8J+3oGEf9JUac6ksjMKmBt3 6eN//S46aat9hd0Un9Zts5k0qsQIvq2JH6ND2Lu9+BjtA6cbM+TUF/Az7VBTSyILDW4e SdxwYpyZowH0CMmlfMCqPPHKWfjEIKaXriH2hlE9fGZeVh/WeDrjLYtJTmViCTfoFKDp 7bdE8ip6R18c7gAbAey2HxdnngCzBIhoYt0QLlyk8QgMOlomxA/5R+4SIa65JCV0mm9F RR4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=d13k5u57O3JTZPOlMkg7/kfE+A9aBhQ8rjkH1q7HKfU=; b=YWibAuLuhE+Z6hl/IXkrjyOTCf/O+a2qMnGr4vT8Vgq0wX3VL9A3hRPVEm3yn5qJKd 95bsjpQjAu/qkGyFO0CRb3FGiFpYPceT2dsN57v0VKu+l5QITc1Fw/gLqsmnalIpRmtm K+ImRdP0bk6kir8eeeF2XQvu6g6Oqh8Um8oh9+N4R0YNz6ZKq9hWgCDygws4sbYBq1pp fZjB64FAVv53u2AzaUFn26Mvw2cGydrZdajgjpN1y3n3XbFQYMbAg2yPmduPlOcnc7vf cS749wNVbLDop9ZW/IgDtvhHBv7CCMCkwseDLzJP1elCvEW+54YlsCWCyY4IY0PDDa+m 3BVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNPGV4gbbAc42niNlEHhpbDYg4eYExc0rjriYxNBjef5xH3MVhSTjUKKrDcbdpucKOq2f5b8XcOv/5How== X-Received: by 10.31.206.68 with SMTP id e65mr16640501vkg.129.1473002923091; Sun, 04 Sep 2016 08:28:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.43.196 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Sep 2016 08:28:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Outback Dingo Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 11:28:02 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Advantages and disadvantages of installing CloudStack manager in a virtual machine within the host. To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114e607efbeca0053bb03712 archived-at: Sun, 04 Sep 2016 15:28:55 -0000 --001a114e607efbeca0053bb03712 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Rene Moser wrote: > Hi > > On 09/03/2016 10:27 PM, Jhon Jaro wrote: > > I have the following query, that would have advantages and disadvantages > > install CloudStack manager in a virtual machine running on the host. > > I don't see any disadvantages in running the CloudStack manager on a VM, > however the host on which the CloudStack manager VM runs must not be > managed by CloudStack. > i kind of dont follow the logic here. id be curious why it should run on another cluster/machine simply put cloudstack in a vm on a host should be intelligent enough to discover itself, and if it isnt architecturally someones missed the design boat. > > You get all the advantages you normally get by the hypervisor, in our > case VMware: Snapshots, Live Migration, DRS. HA. We run the CloudStack > manager on VMware in a different cluster. > > > --001a114e607efbeca0053bb03712--