cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alessandro Caviglione <c.alessan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: R: XenServer bond question
Date Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:31:09 GMT
Since I've 6 NIC for each Server, which is the best config?

2 Management
2 Storage + Guest
2 Public

??

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher <
gabriel@autonomiccs.com.br> wrote:

> I would say that it depends on how critical is your environment, and if
> the storage and management are suffering from low throughput.
>
> If the main focus is redundancy, keeping management + storage in a bond of
> 2 NICs is worth (considering that you would not have other 2 NICs free to
> use and make 2NICs for Storage + 2NICs for management).
>
> However, both traffic will be limited by the same NIC. On the view of
> throughput, keeping management network separate from storage gives the best
> that you can take from a NIC to each network.
>
> Em 23/08/2016 12:53, c.alessandro@gmail.com escreveu:
>
> Ok, so do you think that the best config is to keep management network separate from
storage?
>
> If in next cluster I’ll move storage network to another bond, do you think I’ll able
to use both NIC for throughput?
>
> Da: Gabriel Beims Bräscher
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Gabriel Beims Bräscher
> Florianópolis | Brazil
> <http://autonomiccs.com.br/autonomiccs-website/>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/related (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message