cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nux! <...@li.nux.ro>
Subject Re: State of the S3 secondary storage
Date Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:53:02 GMT
That's a great idea Ilya, but it would indeed "discriminate" against VMware, HyperV and others.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

----- Original Message -----
> From: "ilya" <ilya.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 July, 2016 08:49:53
> Subject: Re: State of the S3 secondary storage

> We've been kicking around idea internally on abstracting secondary
> storage entirely and offload it to cloudstack agent.
> 
> Our biggest gripe is NFS.
> 
> If we can expose S3 (over HTTPs) like service and offload to cloudstack
> agent - we will remove large dependency.
> 
> The only issue we see - is vmware, in which case it will have to be
> backed by NFS...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/19/16 2:37 PM, Nux! wrote:
>> Glusterfs ;)

Mime
View raw message