cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net>
Subject Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
Date Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:23:59 GMT
Audrey,

       If you talk about VPC private gateway you should start a new 
thread. I haven't used it yet.

Vadim.

On 2015-11-18 17:16, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote:

> Vadim,
> 
> I will use VPC also, but in my initial tests (CS 4.5.2), when I tried 
> to configure a static route to a private gateway, using the UI or 
> cloudmonkey, the route was not installed in the VR. Did you notice this 
> problem?
> 
> Audrey
> 
> ----- Mensagem original -----
> De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" <vadim@kickcloud.net>
> Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" <audrey.baldin@unitelco.com.br>, "Remi 
> Bergsma" <RBergsma@schubergphilis.com>
> Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 18 de Novembro de 2015 12:45:28
> Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
> 
> Dear Remi,
> 
> My apologize to mislead Audrey with notations - problem were
> with VPC, not VR. Voting process for 4.6 release was also very
> difficult. Of course official release will be stabilized, but from user
> perspective I will say the same to Aundery - 4.6 will not solve his
> problem with OVS plugin and probably will bring more problems than
> 4.5.2. May be this is just fear before release, but this is my personal
> fear - I will wait until 4.6.1 definitely. My 4.5.2 VPC works too good
> to take a risk of immediate update :)
> 
> Vadim.
> 
> On 2015-11-18 15:32, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> 
>> Hi Vadim,
>> 
>> What VR problems do you refer to in ACS 4.6?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Remi
>> 
>> On 18/11/15 12:52, "Vadim Kimlaychuk" <vadim@kickcloud.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Audrey,
>> 
>> OVS plugin, as I remember, last seen OK before CS 4.4.0. I have 
>> created
>> bug report in JIRA
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1] [1 [1]]. 
>> Since 4.5.1
>> this
>> plugin is not in the list anymore. The reason, I guess, is outdated
>> code
>> that is not compatible with this release. CS 4.6 version has a lot of
>> problems with VR, so I would not recommend you to install it. Don't
>> know
>> if OVS is back there. I doubt.
>> 
>> I think you may find OVS plugin at CS source tree, but whether you 
>> want
>> to update it? Is PVLAN so important for you?
>> 
>> Vadim.
>> 
>> On 2015-11-18 13:30, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Vadim, thanks for your help.
>> 
>> After reading your message I remembered of the plugin area of CS and
>> yes, the OVS plugin is missing. So I ask: Why is it missing? I had 
>> seen
>> it before (CS 4.5.1 probably) and using XEN 6.5 was able to configure
>> PVLAN.
>> 
>> Is it possible to instal the OVS plugin? Where can I find it?
>> 
>> Does CS 4.6 has the plugin out-of-the-box?
>> 
>> Att.,
>> Audrey
>> 
>> ----- Mensagem original -----
>> De: "Vadim Kimlaychuk" <vadim@kickcloud.net>
>> Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: "Audrey Roberto B Baldin" <audrey.baldin@unitelco.com.br>
>> Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Novembro de 2015 19:08:10
>> Assunto: Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan
>> 
>> Hello Audrey,
>> 
>> Look at this document:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN

>> [2]
>> [2 [2]]
>> [1 [1]]
>> XenServer uses OVS and CS have OVS pluging to work with. OVS plugin
>> for cloudstack hasn't been updated for a long time as I know. At my CS
>> 4.5.2 this plugin is missing, though in older versions of CS it was
>> present. I think this functionality does not work for XenServer 6.5.
>> Use
>> VLANs - it is more reliable.
>> 
>> Vadim.
>> 
>> On 2015-11-17 21:11, Audrey Roberto B Baldin wrote:
>> 
>> Hello everybody!
>> 
>> I installed CS 4.5.2 and I'm using XEN 6.5. There is one NIC dedicated
>> for Public traffic, one for MGMT + Secondary Storage, one for Primary
>> Storage and a bond configured for the Guest traffic. Zone is installed
>> as Advanced without Security Groups.
>> 
>> When I add a Guest Network with PVLAN, the network is created, but
>> when
>> I try to create a new instance it does not start. I realized that the
>> virtual router also does not start. Adding a Guest Network without
>> PVLAN works as expected.
>> 
>> Does anyone have an idea about it?
>> 
>> Looking into the log I could find the information below:
>> 
>> 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
>> (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) callHostPlugin failed for cm
>> d: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06:b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label:
>> GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add, dhcp-name:
>> r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.150.236.11, due to There was
>> a failure communicating with the plugin.
>> 
>> 2015-11-17 12:03:48,924 WARN [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
>> (DirectAgent-280:ctx-c1d905bf) Seq 1-6584825605169088819: Thr
>> owable caught while executing command
>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: callHostPlugin failed
>> for cmd: setup-pvlan-dhcp with args dhcp-mac: 06:
>> b9:40:00:08:91, nw-label: GUESTBR0, isolated-pvlan: 999, op: add,
>> dhcp-name: r-10-VM, primary-pvlan: 900, dhcp-ip: 200.1
>> 50.236.11, due to There was a failure communicating with the plugin.
>> at
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.callHostPlugin(CitrixResourceBase.java:3686)
>> at
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:1708)
>> at
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:541)
>> at
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:64)
>> at
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer610Resource.executeRequest(XenServer610Resource.java:87)
>> at
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.XenServer620SP1Resource.executeRequest(XenServer620SP1Resource.java:6
>> 5)
>> at
>> com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.runInContext(DirectAgentAttache.java:302)
>> at
>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
>> at
>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
>> at
>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:1
>> 03)
>> at
>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53
>> )
>> at
>> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
>> at
>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
>> at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.j
>> ava:178)
>> at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:292
>> )
>> at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
>> at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>> 
>> Thanks for your help!
>> 
>> Att.,
>> Audrey
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN

> [2]
> [2 [2]]
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446 [1]
> [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN

> [2]



Links:
------
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446
[2] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN

Mime
View raw message